Obama can't run on his record. he can't bring reason to the table as to how higher taxes and the out of control spending are or will help the nations joblessness, so the only thing left to him and those who adore him is the charge of racism. Is it any wonder then that the newest candidate and arguably the most likely to win again him is already having charges of racism leveled against him.
As is usual there doesn't really need to be any evidence, the charge is enough. It is naturally assumed that anyone from the south must have at least some racism. It is od how these people can't see that such a thing is bigotry. And of course if you don't like a person who happens to be black it can't be because you simply don't like them, don't care for their views, and don’t care for their actions or anything else. Not like a person who is black can only be because you are a racist.
If this line of reasoning is to be considered valid then it is clear those leveling the charge must be racist and hate white people. By leveling the charge they are already declaring their love of black people and therefore anything they say about white people can only be because of racism. It is odd who we can see the absurdity of such a thing and even they will declare such a thing absurd, but when you turn it around it is perfectly reasonable to these people.
I keep hoping for some voice of sanity from the left, but it seems inspite of how Alan Combs uses sarcasm about it, that someone will stop walking lockstep and just defending the democrats no matter what they do and no matter how absurd the defence.
Are there no people among the democrats that will condemn these charges of racism? It does seem awfully early in the race to already be playing the race card. Usually they save the name calling only as a last ditch effort. Maybe they're doing this because they realize they are already out of explanation and excuses for what Obama has done and is still trying to do. Maybe they have already recognized they are defending the indefensible. So far I have heard no reasoned approach to how taxing the rich or any other class of people will produce jobs. I have heard no sound reasoning of how borrowing more money will produce jobs. I have heard no sound reasoning on how forcing everyone to pay more in taxes whether they use health care or not is going to either help being the price of health care donw or save us any money.
Since the left seems to have no reasoned defense for most of what they're doing and don't want to expose their Marxist/communist ideology the only thing left to them is to start wielding the charge of racism.
Sometimes I almost wonder if Obama doesn't revel in being black because he considers that a defense against every charge and he uses it that way.
It is interesting how the media has purposely left out a word when reporting what Perry said about the Federal Reserve. He did not say it would be considered treasonous. He said it could ALMOST be considered treasonous. These two things are not the same, but then the media isn't known for getting it right even 10% of the time when they have a horse in the race.
It is clear the media gets it wrong more often than they get it right and for this reason alone we need to start finding more reliable sources of news. Instead of listening to all their inflammatory rhetoric regarding racism, misquotes, and polls that have questions set up in such a way to get the result they want, we need to start paying attention to what we know is true.
Even as our nation is falling apart financially we seem to have a president to who determined to tear it further apart and devide people against each other in every way he can. He is happy to use race, money, party, sex, and the list goes on. To our current president it seems nothing is more important than dividing the American people against each other and thus weakening us even more.
If our nation is to have any hope of surviving we must begin to turn around this trend as quickly as we can and begin to recognize anew that we are all Americans and to see that is what binds us together. If they cannot overcome our unity we may yet prevail. If they manage to divide us sufficiently it will take very little to break our nation apart and separate us from that which has made us great for so long.
It is clear that both racism and in many cases reverse racism are rampant in the White House, the administration and among our representatives. Such people as Maxine Waters revel in the racism they help create. It is part of the way they control those blacks they have become the plantation overseers of. When I first heard this kind of talk I thought it was absurd till I started to consider how the black people in our nation are being constantly taught by their representatives to settle for far less and then to hate the slave owners. The reality is that people like Maxine Waters, are incompetent and in many cases totally unfit for their position, but they have been picked for those positions to keep their constituents in line, but constantly talking against the "slave owners" which is everyone that is white, no matter what their position. At the same time they promise their mostly black and Latino constituents that they will fight for their rights and that they will do something about it, but all they do is promise to get them more welfare and even to help them get on welfare. Now let me ask, "No matter how good welfare is, is it really such a wonderful lifestyle that people want to life like that for the rest of their lives?"
This is the reverse racism to which I refer. This is black people helping to keep other black people down. All they do is feed them hate and dependence on them as the only people that can help. They teach dependence and unfortunately their constituents buy it.
Their constituents are clearly no better off now than they were 10 years ago, but still the people continue to vote in these people who do nothing for them but make hollow promises. I wonder how long they would put up with the same non-performance from white people.
Now we have the black caucus saying that if the president was not black the blacks would be marching on Washington, but it is more important to them to support him no matter what job he does just because he's a brother. This shows the completely ignorance and hypocrisy they walk in. If you try to point it out they simply either refuse to answer or certainly have no reasonable answer except something that amounts to, "The white man has kept us down for long enough and now THEY"RE tryin to ruin a brother." It is as though it never occurs to them that maybe it isn't the "white man's" fault. They never consider that maybe Obama really is doing a really crappy job. don't they understand that in the long run what this means is that for decades everyone will talk about what happened when the first black man got in office and what they say won't be good.
Monday, September 19, 2011
Class Warfare is Anti-American
Your Fair Share
We hear this term all the time by liberals, especially of the socialist persuasion. The question no one ever seems to ask is how much is fair? On the few occasions when this question has come up, it rarely gets a straight answer. There is good reason for this. The reason is that if they were to be honest what is fair is that they take everything from the rich or at least enough to make them equally poor with the rest of us. It is more about teaching them how it feels to be us than it is about actually helping the system, jobs, the government or anything else. The liberal, communist, socialists, of course can admit this or the game would be up.
Class warfare is very convenient for creating chaos as well as getting a majority of people behind your cause. The bell curve being what it is, it is clear that most people fall in the middle or middle lower income or at least consider themselves to be in these groups. This being the case it makes it very easy to get these people behind most any cause you have as long as you can make it seem that their particular problem is caused by those who have money. Any creative mind can do this fairly easily. All they have to do is mention how these people got their money by taking it from the rest of us, or worse they simply inherited it. Because they "took it from the rest of us, the reasoning goes that, that is is the reason we don't have what we want or what we "should have". This makes it very easy to get these people behind you.
As I see it many of the people who buy into this class warfare are sadly deficient of logic and common sense. Did Michael Jackson, get his 500 million dollars by forcibly or cohesively TAKING it from someone? It is clear this isn't the case. People WANTED to see him perform and as a result felt it was more than fair to pay upwards of $100.00 per ticket. When you look at any specific you see this is the case, unless you look at someone who was running a Ponzi scheme like Maddow, but these people are clearly the exception and usually don't make nearly so much money. Consider Bill Gates. Did he FORCE or COERCE anyone into buying windows? Maybe debatable, People could have bought Apple, or Linux, or Unix, or any number of other operating system; but then if they had it would still be said that those people did the forcing and coercing. The reality is people bought windows and the computers that had windows on them because the computers were cheaper, and because of the number and functionality of the applications that were available for Windows.
Most of these people got rich by buying low, having the foresight to know where the market was going, then selling high when demand was high, or by hard work and innovation; finding or creating a product that people wanted for a price they felt was reasonable. Consider the IPad. What a great and practical product. Though I personally see no use for the thing, clearly millions of other people have felt that it was worth it and were willing to pay $500-$800 to buy them. It is not and was not done with any thought of making Apple rich, or preventing them from becoming rich. It was about wanting to have the product they invented.
So again, I ask, what does "fair share" mean? Is it a set amount? Is it a set percentage? If it is a sliding scale where doe sit end? Who decides? Do the poor decide what the rate should be? How do they determine? What is their basis for evaluating what fair is? It seems nearly impossible to determine what fair is, and honestly I'm not sure why we need to? Since when has it been written that everything in life needs to be fair? Does anyone even ask anymore what fair actually means?
Does fair mean you get what everyone else gets or does it mean you get what you deserve. Liberals would tell us it means you get what everyone else gets. I would contend that it is the latter. Fair means you get what you deserve. it has nothing to do with what anyone else gets.
If this is the case then it would be clear, at the very least, that if you earned something you deserve it! so then others should not have any say in whether you keep it or not.
Another aspect to this is that it says that others should have the right to decide what happens to and with YOUR money. Well of course they are going to want all of YOUR money they can take. After all why work for money if you can legally just take it from people?
Sadly this has become the attitude in the United States now. You shouldn't get to choose if you're going to keep your money; others should decide that and that is just what is happening now. So here we are in a nation of takers. People who no longer want to work for what they get only take what others have worked hard to gain. Anyone who doesn't realize that Michael Jackson worked many many hours to accomplish what he did is fooling themselves. Anyone that doesn't realize that the CEO of a company like Microsoft hasn't work hard every day of their lives to make sure their company stays a leader is crazy or simply doesn't know what that sort of thing requires. I fear that in most cases people simply don't know what it requires to make something like that happen.
It is this complete lack of understanding that makes people such easy prey to class warfare and it is this ignorance that Socialists, Communists, liberals, and others of Obama's ilk depend on when they continually spout their rhetoric. We need to stand against this rhetoric and make it quite clear that we are tired of it and won't stand for it any more.
Rather than applaud and cheer when Obama and others make statements about class warfare we should boo them till they are ashamed to bring it up any more. The second they start they should be booed into silence. Class warfare may be acceptable rhetorical fare in communist countries but in the United States it MOST CERTAINLY IS NOT!
We hear this term all the time by liberals, especially of the socialist persuasion. The question no one ever seems to ask is how much is fair? On the few occasions when this question has come up, it rarely gets a straight answer. There is good reason for this. The reason is that if they were to be honest what is fair is that they take everything from the rich or at least enough to make them equally poor with the rest of us. It is more about teaching them how it feels to be us than it is about actually helping the system, jobs, the government or anything else. The liberal, communist, socialists, of course can admit this or the game would be up.
Class warfare is very convenient for creating chaos as well as getting a majority of people behind your cause. The bell curve being what it is, it is clear that most people fall in the middle or middle lower income or at least consider themselves to be in these groups. This being the case it makes it very easy to get these people behind most any cause you have as long as you can make it seem that their particular problem is caused by those who have money. Any creative mind can do this fairly easily. All they have to do is mention how these people got their money by taking it from the rest of us, or worse they simply inherited it. Because they "took it from the rest of us, the reasoning goes that, that is is the reason we don't have what we want or what we "should have". This makes it very easy to get these people behind you.
As I see it many of the people who buy into this class warfare are sadly deficient of logic and common sense. Did Michael Jackson, get his 500 million dollars by forcibly or cohesively TAKING it from someone? It is clear this isn't the case. People WANTED to see him perform and as a result felt it was more than fair to pay upwards of $100.00 per ticket. When you look at any specific you see this is the case, unless you look at someone who was running a Ponzi scheme like Maddow, but these people are clearly the exception and usually don't make nearly so much money. Consider Bill Gates. Did he FORCE or COERCE anyone into buying windows? Maybe debatable, People could have bought Apple, or Linux, or Unix, or any number of other operating system; but then if they had it would still be said that those people did the forcing and coercing. The reality is people bought windows and the computers that had windows on them because the computers were cheaper, and because of the number and functionality of the applications that were available for Windows.
Most of these people got rich by buying low, having the foresight to know where the market was going, then selling high when demand was high, or by hard work and innovation; finding or creating a product that people wanted for a price they felt was reasonable. Consider the IPad. What a great and practical product. Though I personally see no use for the thing, clearly millions of other people have felt that it was worth it and were willing to pay $500-$800 to buy them. It is not and was not done with any thought of making Apple rich, or preventing them from becoming rich. It was about wanting to have the product they invented.
So again, I ask, what does "fair share" mean? Is it a set amount? Is it a set percentage? If it is a sliding scale where doe sit end? Who decides? Do the poor decide what the rate should be? How do they determine? What is their basis for evaluating what fair is? It seems nearly impossible to determine what fair is, and honestly I'm not sure why we need to? Since when has it been written that everything in life needs to be fair? Does anyone even ask anymore what fair actually means?
Does fair mean you get what everyone else gets or does it mean you get what you deserve. Liberals would tell us it means you get what everyone else gets. I would contend that it is the latter. Fair means you get what you deserve. it has nothing to do with what anyone else gets.
If this is the case then it would be clear, at the very least, that if you earned something you deserve it! so then others should not have any say in whether you keep it or not.
Another aspect to this is that it says that others should have the right to decide what happens to and with YOUR money. Well of course they are going to want all of YOUR money they can take. After all why work for money if you can legally just take it from people?
Sadly this has become the attitude in the United States now. You shouldn't get to choose if you're going to keep your money; others should decide that and that is just what is happening now. So here we are in a nation of takers. People who no longer want to work for what they get only take what others have worked hard to gain. Anyone who doesn't realize that Michael Jackson worked many many hours to accomplish what he did is fooling themselves. Anyone that doesn't realize that the CEO of a company like Microsoft hasn't work hard every day of their lives to make sure their company stays a leader is crazy or simply doesn't know what that sort of thing requires. I fear that in most cases people simply don't know what it requires to make something like that happen.
It is this complete lack of understanding that makes people such easy prey to class warfare and it is this ignorance that Socialists, Communists, liberals, and others of Obama's ilk depend on when they continually spout their rhetoric. We need to stand against this rhetoric and make it quite clear that we are tired of it and won't stand for it any more.
Rather than applaud and cheer when Obama and others make statements about class warfare we should boo them till they are ashamed to bring it up any more. The second they start they should be booed into silence. Class warfare may be acceptable rhetorical fare in communist countries but in the United States it MOST CERTAINLY IS NOT!
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
It's Bush's Fault, Everything is Bush's Fault
Will we never hear any responsibility from the White House? Obama is now trying to blame the Solyndra debacle on Bush now. After all Bush started the process so Obama had no choice but to complete. Bush started checking into them, so Obama is not responsible to make sure what Bush found was correct.
Think about this for just one second. Obama is a man who both feels and says that ALL of his problems were due to the incompetence of Bush. Now let me ask you a question. If you knew the guy that had your position before you did nothing but mess things up would you continue to do the same things? Woudl you continue projects he'd started without taking a very serious look at them? Would you continue a war he started? If you did and those things turned out wrong wouldn't you expect your employer to blame and even fire you for the same incompetence?!
The next thing you know Obama will be blaming bush for the war in Libya because Bush may have thought about it at one point and of course this forced Obama to do it?
When will these ridiculous excuses and blame come to an end? Obama is incapable of taking responsibility for things that go wrong. If anything goes wrong it must be the fault of someone else. The narcissism Obama exhibits ought to scare the daylights out of every American. Not only can Obama never admit that he's wrong in words, but he also absolutely WILL NOT change any policy or action that he's started. The reason for this seems pretty clear. He will never change any direction or policy he's started because to do so would also be an admission that he was wrong. This alone makes him a very dangerous man.
On top of all this he exhibits near disdain for the constitution and for the United States as a whole. He seems to feel that the United States has never really done anything right and that we're nothing more than evil imperialists. He may not use those words, but his attitude seems fairly clear.
The only thing he wants to take responsibility for is destroying this evil nation.
Think about this for a moment. He must even know how wrong he was about health care because he never mentions it as one of his accomplishments. It is one of the few things he was able to ram down the throats of the American people and yet he never boasts what a good thing it is. Of course he's probably waiting to see how that turns out so he can blame this on Bush as well.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not particularly happy with the way Bush ran up the deficit and spend like a drunken democrat either, but at some point a person must accept responsibility for his own actions and decision. Bush is not the one that OK'd the loan to Solyndra. Obama could have said no at any point, but he not only didn't say no, he further pressured the OMB to push this loan through. This is something he wanted and he was determined to get. It is his responsibility. If he's going to blame it on the incompetence of another then it only indicates his own incompetence at checking up on what other people have done, which is most certainly his job unless he feels that Bush should still be doing that as well.
I would pity Obama but at this point he needs severe rebuke. It is as though is parent never taught him to take any responsibility. What a poor upbringing he must have had. It probably explains why he never really held a real job, or ran a business. He knows nothing about real responsibility. He is the product of politically correct self esteem which teaches that you are always right, no one should ever tell you you're wrong. God forbid you should fail a test, so let's make the tests such that there is no wrong answer and everyone passes. Let's not keep points in games so we have no losers and if we do have points in the game then let's either blame the other players, the other team, the rules of the game, or the referees; After all it certainly can't be because of our poor skills that we didn't win. This is the era Obama was brought up in. He is a product of this kind of liberal education and as such has never learned to take any responsibility for anything!
He would rather see our nation sink into obscurity than admit anything he's done is wrong.
Think about this for just one second. Obama is a man who both feels and says that ALL of his problems were due to the incompetence of Bush. Now let me ask you a question. If you knew the guy that had your position before you did nothing but mess things up would you continue to do the same things? Woudl you continue projects he'd started without taking a very serious look at them? Would you continue a war he started? If you did and those things turned out wrong wouldn't you expect your employer to blame and even fire you for the same incompetence?!
The next thing you know Obama will be blaming bush for the war in Libya because Bush may have thought about it at one point and of course this forced Obama to do it?
When will these ridiculous excuses and blame come to an end? Obama is incapable of taking responsibility for things that go wrong. If anything goes wrong it must be the fault of someone else. The narcissism Obama exhibits ought to scare the daylights out of every American. Not only can Obama never admit that he's wrong in words, but he also absolutely WILL NOT change any policy or action that he's started. The reason for this seems pretty clear. He will never change any direction or policy he's started because to do so would also be an admission that he was wrong. This alone makes him a very dangerous man.
On top of all this he exhibits near disdain for the constitution and for the United States as a whole. He seems to feel that the United States has never really done anything right and that we're nothing more than evil imperialists. He may not use those words, but his attitude seems fairly clear.
The only thing he wants to take responsibility for is destroying this evil nation.
Think about this for a moment. He must even know how wrong he was about health care because he never mentions it as one of his accomplishments. It is one of the few things he was able to ram down the throats of the American people and yet he never boasts what a good thing it is. Of course he's probably waiting to see how that turns out so he can blame this on Bush as well.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not particularly happy with the way Bush ran up the deficit and spend like a drunken democrat either, but at some point a person must accept responsibility for his own actions and decision. Bush is not the one that OK'd the loan to Solyndra. Obama could have said no at any point, but he not only didn't say no, he further pressured the OMB to push this loan through. This is something he wanted and he was determined to get. It is his responsibility. If he's going to blame it on the incompetence of another then it only indicates his own incompetence at checking up on what other people have done, which is most certainly his job unless he feels that Bush should still be doing that as well.
I would pity Obama but at this point he needs severe rebuke. It is as though is parent never taught him to take any responsibility. What a poor upbringing he must have had. It probably explains why he never really held a real job, or ran a business. He knows nothing about real responsibility. He is the product of politically correct self esteem which teaches that you are always right, no one should ever tell you you're wrong. God forbid you should fail a test, so let's make the tests such that there is no wrong answer and everyone passes. Let's not keep points in games so we have no losers and if we do have points in the game then let's either blame the other players, the other team, the rules of the game, or the referees; After all it certainly can't be because of our poor skills that we didn't win. This is the era Obama was brought up in. He is a product of this kind of liberal education and as such has never learned to take any responsibility for anything!
He would rather see our nation sink into obscurity than admit anything he's done is wrong.
The Jewish People Need to Wake Up
As a Jew myself it has always mystified me why any Jew would support the democrat party. They have been the party of hate, and prejudice almost since their inception. They fought to keep slavery not end it; a history I'm sure they'd rather we all forget and they have done everything they can to help that happen by helping to change what is taught about the history of this great nation.
One only has to look at the policies of Obama toward Israel to see that he is no friend of the Jewish people. One only has ot look at almost all of his personal association to see that he has befriended radicals and terrorists on far too many occasions and still maintains those relationships. He has never really denounced either Rev. Wright or the things that he taught in his church. The most he would do is say that he had no idea those things were being taught. This is absolutely absurd. A pastor with Rev. Wright's bent does not teach something like that only once every year or two so that if you were to miss a sermon it might be the only one where he mentioned some of the egregious things he did. People like Rev. Wright cannot help but make mention of his hatred on such a regular basis that even a cursory look would tell you what he believes.
Rev. Wright clearly has it in for the Jews. The New Black Panthers are the same. Rev. Jesse Jackson, though more mild about it seem to hold similar views. Then you have Bill Ayers who helped with the flotilla against Israel that turned into such a debachal. The list goes on and on. There have been entirely too many of these things.
You have Obama who knowingly put his feet up on the desk while meeting with the Prime Minister of Israel. He certainly must know what an insult that would be. Shortly after that he decided it was more important to have dinner with his family and simply walk out on the Prime Minister than to try to work things out with him.
You have Obama, behaving as though he was king of the world, and as though anything he declared simply must be obeyed, telling the Israelis where they can and can't build in their own country.
The list of offenses by this president is very long and yet the Jewish community in the United States still stands behind the president and his party. I really wish someone could explain and defend this behavior intelligently and with more than platitudes. Like the democrats they simply make completely unsupported statements as though it were known fact and not to be questioned, with no rational behind them. To me this always means that a person or people don't understand why they believe what they do. It usually indicates nothing less than brainwashing, the effects of propaganda or simple lack of thought and reason.
The only thing I've been able to think of is that American Jews believe what happened in Germany and other nations of the world could never happen here and that the democrats are their protectors regardless of how they treat the Israeli Jews. Sadly too many Jews in America care nothing for the suffering and persecution of their brothers around the world. For this reason alone they do not even deserve to be considered part of the Jewish nation.
I do not believe the Jews in this nation are likely to wake up and realize what is happening till it begins to happen to them. Like Germany when the tide turns against the Jews in the nation there will be little to no opportunity for them to escape to what may be the only safe place on earth for them, Israel!
One only has to look at the policies of Obama toward Israel to see that he is no friend of the Jewish people. One only has ot look at almost all of his personal association to see that he has befriended radicals and terrorists on far too many occasions and still maintains those relationships. He has never really denounced either Rev. Wright or the things that he taught in his church. The most he would do is say that he had no idea those things were being taught. This is absolutely absurd. A pastor with Rev. Wright's bent does not teach something like that only once every year or two so that if you were to miss a sermon it might be the only one where he mentioned some of the egregious things he did. People like Rev. Wright cannot help but make mention of his hatred on such a regular basis that even a cursory look would tell you what he believes.
Rev. Wright clearly has it in for the Jews. The New Black Panthers are the same. Rev. Jesse Jackson, though more mild about it seem to hold similar views. Then you have Bill Ayers who helped with the flotilla against Israel that turned into such a debachal. The list goes on and on. There have been entirely too many of these things.
You have Obama who knowingly put his feet up on the desk while meeting with the Prime Minister of Israel. He certainly must know what an insult that would be. Shortly after that he decided it was more important to have dinner with his family and simply walk out on the Prime Minister than to try to work things out with him.
You have Obama, behaving as though he was king of the world, and as though anything he declared simply must be obeyed, telling the Israelis where they can and can't build in their own country.
The list of offenses by this president is very long and yet the Jewish community in the United States still stands behind the president and his party. I really wish someone could explain and defend this behavior intelligently and with more than platitudes. Like the democrats they simply make completely unsupported statements as though it were known fact and not to be questioned, with no rational behind them. To me this always means that a person or people don't understand why they believe what they do. It usually indicates nothing less than brainwashing, the effects of propaganda or simple lack of thought and reason.
The only thing I've been able to think of is that American Jews believe what happened in Germany and other nations of the world could never happen here and that the democrats are their protectors regardless of how they treat the Israeli Jews. Sadly too many Jews in America care nothing for the suffering and persecution of their brothers around the world. For this reason alone they do not even deserve to be considered part of the Jewish nation.
I do not believe the Jews in this nation are likely to wake up and realize what is happening till it begins to happen to them. Like Germany when the tide turns against the Jews in the nation there will be little to no opportunity for them to escape to what may be the only safe place on earth for them, Israel!
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
Maxine Waters - We Need to spend a trillion dollars on new jobs
When I hear someone like her say something like this I have to wonder two things. Does she even know how much a trillion dollars is and does she have any idea where it comes from, or does she just think the government has unlimited amounts of money to spend on whatever they want.
To the first question, whether she knows how much money that is, honestly I don't think she has any concept of what a trillion dollars is. In real numbers this is approx $3,000 from the pockets of every man women and child in the United States. That's assuming that every man woman and child is working and can pay it. Now if we could afford to pay it we wouldn't need someone to give us the money would we, so even this is absurd for her to suggest.
It would seem the typical answer to everything for liberals is to throw OUR money at it and the ever famous, we need to educate people, as the second answer to the problem. They seem to think if you just give people facts it will change their behavior. Has AIDS gone away because of education on safe sex? To the contrary, it's made people feel safe to have sex. Does educating people about the good of telling the truth make people honest. If it did then we would not have a single liar in the nation, for we all know it is wrong to tell a lie.
If people like Maxine Waters doesn't know what a trillion is by now then she needs to go back to third grade. It is clear that she understands it's a number with 12 zeros after it, but beyond it doesn't mean anything to her as to how much work it takes to pay that back, and there is no concern that we the people would have to pay it back. She only wants to appear generous, WITH OUR MONEY!
Do we really need people with that sort of generosity running our nation.
To the second question I do not believe Maxine Waters or her ild ever consider where this money comes from, they think like many uneducated Americans that the government has as much money as it needs and if it doesn't have any more that it can just print it. It would seem that they think money just comes from thin air and from the government. In their minds the government makes the money and then gives it to us to use. It is probably for this reason that they think we owe them something and that they have every right to as much of our money as they want; after all they figure it came from them in the first place.
These two simplistic views are in evidence on a regular basis in the democrat party. They have no real concept of where real wealth comes from. They seem to think that wealth is something the government gave people and so they have ever right to take it back.
What self deluded world to democrats live in, and republicans for that matter too, or at least the elite republicans who've been in office for 20+ years?
Now we have the president talking all the time that it is time for the republicans to put the country ahead of their party... Translation: You should let us do whatever we want after all the democrats are the only ones that put country ahead of party.
Of course it is easy to be generous and caring with other people's money. I wouldn't mind a little of that generosity myself, so I propose that every congressional member must give up 75% of everything they own to help the poor. If they don't then it's clear that I care more about the poor than they do. After all this is what they're saying all the time. The media and the politicians are constantly talking about how uncompassionate it is for the government not to help people in need, storm victims, people who want abortions, people who want but don't have houses, and the list goes on. It is so easy to be compassionate and give these people all the things they want, OUR OF OTHER PEOPLE'S POCKETS.
Maxine Waters and her ilk are so out of touch with the rest of America that it's frightening.
Now of course we have Obama about to tell us how much we still need to "invest" more. This always means spend. He wants to impress on us how much the republicans don't want to bend because it makes it much harder for them to say that it is really the democrats that are not bending at all.
It is the democrats who can't offer anything more than to spend more money. They will put the country back to work by making the rest of us pay for it with taxes. They don't want businesses to do it, they want government to do it, but then aren't we the government? Isn't it our taxes that will put them back to work. I would rather have it be my investments, and I mean real investments that pay dividends putting people back to work.
Maxine Waters and Barack Obama, the socialists that they are simply don't understand this concept. All they understand is redistribution of wealth and this is what they mean to see happen.
To the first question, whether she knows how much money that is, honestly I don't think she has any concept of what a trillion dollars is. In real numbers this is approx $3,000 from the pockets of every man women and child in the United States. That's assuming that every man woman and child is working and can pay it. Now if we could afford to pay it we wouldn't need someone to give us the money would we, so even this is absurd for her to suggest.
It would seem the typical answer to everything for liberals is to throw OUR money at it and the ever famous, we need to educate people, as the second answer to the problem. They seem to think if you just give people facts it will change their behavior. Has AIDS gone away because of education on safe sex? To the contrary, it's made people feel safe to have sex. Does educating people about the good of telling the truth make people honest. If it did then we would not have a single liar in the nation, for we all know it is wrong to tell a lie.
If people like Maxine Waters doesn't know what a trillion is by now then she needs to go back to third grade. It is clear that she understands it's a number with 12 zeros after it, but beyond it doesn't mean anything to her as to how much work it takes to pay that back, and there is no concern that we the people would have to pay it back. She only wants to appear generous, WITH OUR MONEY!
Do we really need people with that sort of generosity running our nation.
To the second question I do not believe Maxine Waters or her ild ever consider where this money comes from, they think like many uneducated Americans that the government has as much money as it needs and if it doesn't have any more that it can just print it. It would seem that they think money just comes from thin air and from the government. In their minds the government makes the money and then gives it to us to use. It is probably for this reason that they think we owe them something and that they have every right to as much of our money as they want; after all they figure it came from them in the first place.
These two simplistic views are in evidence on a regular basis in the democrat party. They have no real concept of where real wealth comes from. They seem to think that wealth is something the government gave people and so they have ever right to take it back.
What self deluded world to democrats live in, and republicans for that matter too, or at least the elite republicans who've been in office for 20+ years?
Now we have the president talking all the time that it is time for the republicans to put the country ahead of their party... Translation: You should let us do whatever we want after all the democrats are the only ones that put country ahead of party.
Of course it is easy to be generous and caring with other people's money. I wouldn't mind a little of that generosity myself, so I propose that every congressional member must give up 75% of everything they own to help the poor. If they don't then it's clear that I care more about the poor than they do. After all this is what they're saying all the time. The media and the politicians are constantly talking about how uncompassionate it is for the government not to help people in need, storm victims, people who want abortions, people who want but don't have houses, and the list goes on. It is so easy to be compassionate and give these people all the things they want, OUR OF OTHER PEOPLE'S POCKETS.
Maxine Waters and her ilk are so out of touch with the rest of America that it's frightening.
Now of course we have Obama about to tell us how much we still need to "invest" more. This always means spend. He wants to impress on us how much the republicans don't want to bend because it makes it much harder for them to say that it is really the democrats that are not bending at all.
It is the democrats who can't offer anything more than to spend more money. They will put the country back to work by making the rest of us pay for it with taxes. They don't want businesses to do it, they want government to do it, but then aren't we the government? Isn't it our taxes that will put them back to work. I would rather have it be my investments, and I mean real investments that pay dividends putting people back to work.
Maxine Waters and Barack Obama, the socialists that they are simply don't understand this concept. All they understand is redistribution of wealth and this is what they mean to see happen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)