Why are we so willing to always take the blame for others' actions. It may go to our absurd understanding of psychology. The reason you behave the way you do is because others made you.
I wonder sometimes in our politically correct country how many would be willing to say that the reason that a woman was raped was because she dressed nicely or even provocatively? Or maybe saying the reason a man committed murder is because someone made fun of his mother? Would we really accept this kind of reasoning? If not then why do we not only accept it, but even offer it when Muslims murder people and try to blame it on a video?
I wonder would the same people like Geraldo Rivera be so willing to defend Christians if they burned down a museum for showing showing that picture of Christ in piss? or maybe the Catholics going crazy for the picture of Mary in elephant dung?I think we all recognize that we would not accept this as explainable behavior. We would be so quick to condemn it that it would make your head spin, yet the media and the government is unwilling to apply the same standard to the Muslims.Well we are told we need to understand their culture is different than ours. This is the most ridiculous reasoning I've heard.
Isn't it about time we called this what it is. Backward, barbaric, atrocious and every other word we can think of to condemn such behavior. They certainly have no tolerance and no sensitivity and what I have to say is enough of pretending to have the high ground by not condemning it!
We really need to man up and call what they did terrorism and an attack on the American people/ What they did in any other time would be an act of war! People really need to look at the pictures on the net and the videos of what they did to our Ambassador and remember that he is an official representative of the United States chosen to essential speak for the president.
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it! — Abraham Lincoln
Friday, September 21, 2012
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Voter ID Hypocrisy
Following are some of the false and hypocritical reasons given for making sure that we don't really know who's voting and if they are actual citizens.
- “Unfair voting laws are being passed by politicians who are trying to manipulate the system for their own benefit – because they don’t like what voters have to say.”
- “It’s wrong to pass laws for political gain that take away the right to vote from millions of eligible citizens, including seniors and veterans.”
- “As the world’s leading democracy, we can’t pass laws that block some eligible Americans from voting, or that deny them the opportunity to participate equally in our democracy.”
- “Emphasize the need for flexibility in ID laws, and that ‘one size doesn’t fit all.’”
The reason I say each of these is hypocritical is because they pretend that there is no voter fraud. They pretend that everyone that votes is a citizen or even alive. We have yet to hear of one documented case of an actual citizen who was denied the right to vote, but we have already seen many cases of voter fraud.
Isn't it unfair to the citizens who are alive and legal to have their votes stolen or nullified by those who are not citizens or even by dead people? Yet they want to fight against people showing a simple ID. Their justification for being against ID is completely fallacious. You can't even get a library card without showing ID, and certainly you couldn't get into the Democratic convention without showing one. The party of inclusion most certainly wants to include those who have no right to vote in the hope that it will turn thing in their favor.
They state above that we are the worlds leading Democracy which again shows they don't even know what form of government we have. We are a republic... more specifically we are a democratic republic which is not at all the same thing as a democracy. Our founding fathers saw the dangers of a democracy and so they decided we wouldn't have one. It is communists and socialists, and progressives that like to declare a democracy.
I am not for having to "show our papers" when we are just out walking on the streets, but I do not have a problem with a person having to identify themselves as an American in order to vote. At one time we probably didn't need to worry very much about that issue and so laws were fairly lax, but we now have between 12 and 20 million illegal people in this country. That's a lot of votes and no I don't think our laws should be such that we are so afraid of taking away one person's vote for the sake of allowing millions of others to vote who shouldn't. This would clearly be worse for the system than not requiring some sort of proof of citizenship. Realistically a license doesn't even prove it, but it is still better than nothing.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
The Oath of Office
When Congress refuses
to act then I have an obligation to do what I can without them - Barak
Obama
This just goes to show
how lawless Obama is as well as his contempt for the constitution. This should
have caused every American a great deal of concern when he said it, yet the
media had almost nothing to say about it and as a result most Americans are not
aware that we have such a man now running the country. Who knows maybe many
Americans feel that if congress can’t get their act together maybe there is
something wrong with the constitution and this is what needs to be done.
If this is the case then
all I can say is that these people are not thinking very clearly. They do not
understand where this can ultimately go, whether it is with this president or with
another. Ultimate power was not vested in the president or any other individual
person for a reason.
Oddly we have a president
to makes a habit of accusing his opponents of the very things he’s doing. Most
label this hypocritical, but when it is about almost everything it becomes
sociopathic, or something else. Most people who are hypocrites really don’t
realize they’re doing the very thing they accuse others of. I believe in Barak
Obama’s case he is completely aware that he’s doing those thing. The reason he
accuses others first of the things he’s either doing or already done is because
it makes it harder for them to turn around an accuse him.
Just talking in this way
as more than a joke should be treated with the utmost concern and vigilance.
Though it may not legally be so, it seems that such talk borders on being an
impeachable offense. Regardless he has indeed acted on the talk and has now
bypassed congress on several occasions overturning laws they passed with the
scribble of a pen on an executive order. The president doesn’t have such power
and as such impeachment proceedings should have begun. The excuse that he may be out of office at the next
election is no reason for congress not to uphold the laws of the land and the
constitution.
Obama Is Not Inept!
For quite some time I’ve been hearing that Obama must be
inept because of the way he’s been handling things. I personally do not believe
this is the case. I do not believe the things that have been happening to our
nation are because he is inept. Quite the opposite I believe the things that
are happening to our nation at the hands of Obama and his administration are by
design. I believe he knows full well what he is doing to our economy and to the
constitution and it is quite intentional.
I do not believe that Obama shares any great love for this
nation. I believe that his communist upbringing by those who revere the way the
soviets do things is what is in play. I believe Obama is a Manchurian president
as has been stated by Klein.
At one point Obama said he would destroy the coal industry
and that if you wanted to start a coal business you could but that you would go
broke. At another point he said that the price of fuel would “necessarily
skyrocket” and isn’t this what has happened. Coal companies are going out of
business because they cannot afford to stay in business and we now have
gasoline that will soon be approaching $5.00 per gallon.
Why does no one remember that Obama said these things, or
that they are now happening? Why is it that no one gives him the credit or the
blame for the way things are going?
Why are people so unwilling to believe that Obama might
actually be working against the interests of the United States?
I believe the reason so many people are unwilling to admit
these things might be true of our president is because to admit this would also
be to admit that they had made the wrong choice and that they had not vetted
him enough before voting for them. I’m sure my next remark will be read as
racism, but I can’t help but wonder if many people didn’t vote for Obama simply
for the reason that he was black. They wanted to prove to themselves that they
weren’t racists and they felt the best way to do that was to vote for a man
that was black. Of course the fact that they did that without knowing anything
about it really only shows some odd form of reverse racism. Voting for someone
who is black, simply because he is black is no better than voting for someone
who is white simply because they are white.
It does not take much looking to see that Obama shows all
the classic signs of a person who is both sociopathic, and narcissistic. In
almost every interaction he has with people he seems to view them as nothing
more than to be used for his own gain. If they stop performing that function he
casts them aside like an old rag. This is one of the defining traits of a
sociopath. He shows know compassion for people only for those things that can
only be termed as communist causes.
Obama also displays typical megalomania. He is so hungry for
power and for him everything seems to come down to the issue of power over
others. This can nowhere be seen as clearly as in the way community organizing
works. It is about power and intimidation. Megalomania as the dictionary
defines it is: Medicine. a form of
mental illness characterized by the unreasonable conviction in the patient of
his own greatness, goodness, power, or wealth. Obama is both obsessed with
himself and not only thinks he is or has the answer to everything, but thinks
everyone else should feel the same way. It has been reported that he has a very
thin skin and this can be evidenced by the way he attacks every person of note,
wealth or power that dares to criticize him.
He seems to have no moral compass, at least not as most people
define it. To him the end justifies the means and that means is always whatever
will keep him in power. The constant lies and exaggerations that come out of
his own month or those of his minions ought to be evidence enough that the
truth means nothing to him.
He is certainly brilliant about bullying others into
silence. There are no other areas where this is so evident than in in the area
of his birth certificate, where it is completely taboo to even bring it up without
everyone labeling you a nut even though no one, I repeat NO ONE has seen the
original or verified it, and the other area is his school records which have
also been assiduously kept from all scrutiny.
He did similar things regarding areas that clearly indicate
he is either a socialist or a communist. All it took was a strong challenge by
him, saying, “Are you saying I’m a socialist?” and people backed off and
refused to pursue it. Now people are afraid to bring it up any more even though
there is more than ample evidence to show that he is either one or the other.
He never denied it, he only had to challenge them saying it and they shut up
immediately.
Friday, August 10, 2012
Is Congress Irrelevant?
In an article on The Hill website today we see yet another
example of the irrelevance of congress as well as the growing power of the
executive branch. Obama has discovered a secret that no other president has found,
or at the very least have certainly not been brave enough to use. Obama has
found that he can just make up new laws with executive orders. This is
certainly not a power the constitution every gave to the president.
Oddly our representatives seem afraid to do or say anything
about it. With each executive order the president issues that are
unconstitutional he becomes braver to do more and at the same time our
representatives become more afraid to say anything about it because they have
already let so many others go through without saying anything.
As Obama has said before: “When Congress refuses to act then
I have an obligation to do what I can without them?”
He has now shown a complete willingness to do exactly this.
It is not like this is only a one-time thing. The president has been making it
a regular habit of late and still nothing gets said about it.
Obama has shown on all too many occasions is contempt for
both the constitution and the American way of life. At the very least he feels
things should be socialist, and possibly severely Marxist. I believe he is at
the very least a fair ways left of European socialism. Those of his own party
who are frustrated with him are only so because they are true communist, are
open about it and feel that other true communists should be equally as open.
They are bothered with the idea that Obama, for political expediency has to
keep his communism under cover at least until he is elected to a second term.
He understands that the American people would never re-elect him otherwise. If
he is re-elected to another term then I have little doubt that his communism
will come out of the closet since it won’t make a difference after that point.
After all if he can’t forcibly stay in power he will also not be able to be voted
back in due to the term limits on the presidency.
This was a line taken from TheHill.com:
Republicans have already accused President Obama of making
illegal power grabs with his previous executive actions, and a cybersecurity
order would likely elicit similar howls of disapproval.
It seems the most any in congress can muster when they’re
constitutional rights and responsibilities are being stepped on is to say that
they disapprove, but no action accompanying that disapproval ever seems to
happen. They are more than content to simply wait for the next election. Their
attitude seems to be that the constitution and the American culture will
survive till the next election and they can try to fix things then, but they
never do fix them. They never undo anything previous presidents have done
through executive orders and as such they end up having the force of law.
They are ceding power to the president that the presidency
was never meant to have according to the constitution. There ought to be far
more than disapproval on Capitol Hill. There ought to be far more than outrage!
There ought to be impeachment when the president begins to exercise power that
is not his to exercise. There needs to be far more push back than just
disapproval.
I know the democrats are not complaining because the
president is using those orders to do things they want to do but can no longer
do because they don’t have a super majority. I suppose they either don’t think
about how those same powers will be used, based on precedent when the other
side gets in power. Either that or they figure they’ll just intimidate the
republican president if he tries to do the same because they always have the
power of the press behind them. Maybe they are right about being able to do
this, but it still doesn’t change the principle of the matter.
Liar, Liar!
It would seem the Obama campaign doesn’t care the slightest
how big the lie is about his opponent. He also doesn’t care how easy it is to
debunk. All he cares about is getting it out there and of course reporters
report on it before they even do a cursory investigation. Now it’s that poor
sad man who blames Romney for his wife’s death.
Obama and team knew full well before reporting it that it
was COMPLETELY untrue.
All I can say is what Obama is doing is very much like
Hitler. Yes I know he is the “one who is not to be named” But it was Hitler
that said if you’re going to lie tell a big lie and tell it often and Obama
seems to be taking a lesson from that.
It has reached to point for me that whenever I hear anything
from the Obama administration I don’t just assume there might be some falsehood
or that it’s partly true, I assume the whole thing is a lie completely made up
with no merit whatsoever.
Obama clearly has nothing substantial on Romney at all. If
he had anything real on Romney he certainly would have started presenting it by
now. I’m sure his people are desperately looking for something with actual
facts to back it up. I’m hopeful that others have reached the point I have with
Obama’s constant lies.
I must admit in some respects that it is refreshing to know
that we have one person running for present who actually might be what he
presents himself to be; a good moral man who truly wants to do what’s best for
this nation.
The only things I’m not convinced of with Romney is that
he’s really as conservative as he’s leading people to believe he is. I’m also
not so sure he can be depended on to get rid of Obamacare.
One thing I am sure of is that Obama cannot be trusted to
run this nation, but then I was pretty sure of that when during his first
campaign no one could find out anything about his past. I couldn’t help but
wonder why a man would so assiduously hide every fact about his past. I was
also quite surprised that anyone would be willing to vote for a man to be the
president of the United States whose entire qualifications were nothing more
than community organizing.
Obama knows nothing about business except he hates it. He
knows nothing of success that is earned since he has not really earned a bit of
what he has. “He didn’t build it!” but then this too is in complete keeping
with Obama. He understands the value of accusing others of the things you’re
guilty of and doing it before they do because it makes them sound like copy
cats.
I find it offensive and lacking any character for Obama to
use cancer victims in the way that he is, but then to have them lie or to put
the lies in their mouths is even more appalling. They must have dug very deep
to find that man as well as to find a man who was willing to lie just to
support the candidate he likes. It was certainly easy enough for anyone to
check to see that what the man said was a lie or as I’m sure they’ll say an
embellishment. Clearly this man did not come forward of his own volition. The
Obama campaign went out and found this man and probably offered him a lot to
lie the way he has.
Why do people including the news continue to behave as though these lies are accidental or an oversight on the part of the president? The things being said in the news go way beyond exaggeration.
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Obama: The Broken Record
It is just me or does it seems that every campaign speech by
Obama has begun to sound like a broken record. It seems he can talk about
nothing else but “the rich not paying their fair share” and how he cares about
the middle class. Why his defenders say this isn’t class warfare is a mystery
to me.
This kind of talk is right out of the communist handbook on
how to create a revolution.
So what is the solution Obama offers? Tax the rich more! How
does that help the middle class in their tax burden?
It never ceases to amaze me how the government just refuses
to lower anyone’s taxes. It’s all a shell game. What they want to do is make
the middle class feel better about their taxes by taxing others even more. This
in no way alleviates the burden of taxes on anyone!
It is odd that the solutions never include lowering anyone’s
taxes or cutting spending. The people in Washington are spendaholics, but the
problem is that it’s always with OUR money!
Obama has offered no solutions and seems unable to talk
about any of the issues so everything turns into personal attacks and more
class warfare. He or his surrogate super pacs are either calling Romney a tax
cheat, a felon, or most recently a killer. Do they address the issue of the
economy? No, they don’t talk about the economy at all except when they try to
blame the poor economy on… yes, you guessed it, THE RICH!
Obama is very big on blame and very small on responsibility.
He’s not talking quite as much that the poor economy is the fault of Bush only
because it doesn’t poll well anymore. It’s hard to blame it on anyone else
because he is after all the top executive position in the country!
In many respects the blame he puts on the rich is rather
like a CEO blaming his managers for the direction of the company. He doesn’t
dare blame the workers or he’ll have an uprising so instead he gets the workers
to be mad at middle management (the rich) for the failures of the his company
(country).
I understand he wants to get elected and admitting he’s not
really up to the job and doesn’t have a clue how to fix things, and who knows
maybe even doesn’t care about fixing things and as such is not going to admit
anything is his fault.
What most people either don’t understand or don’t want to
believe is that the things happening to this country are by design. Obama has
caused much of this personally through executive orders, excessive regulation
(EPA, FCC, and various other organizations) and the like, that he cannot even
blame congress for the woes. He has tried on occasion to blame congress, but I
think he’s started getting push back from his own party because people are no
longer fooled by this lie either. Every time it comes up it is made clear that
the Democrats had a filibuster proof congress for 2 years and they didn’t fix
things. All they did was spend more money, increase the regulations on
businesses and add healthcare to the mix.
They have spent TRILLIONS of dollars of our money, and they
have nothing to show for it. Now they’re talking about yet another Quantitative
Easing, You can read this as another bailout/spending/stimulus. Most Americans
are getting fed up with the idea of all this spending that isn’t doing anything
to help America.
I hope anyone reading this article will be conscious every
time they hear Obama speak what the theme of his message is. I only wish I had
a way to easily review or play back his last 10-20 campaign speeches. It sure
seems that all he talks about is the rich and how they’re not paying their fair
share.
As I mentioned above it is interesting that they never
really talk about the principle there because otherwise they know that we would
realize is that they’re saying the middle class is paying more than their fair
share. Beside the fact that this is not true, still the problem of the middle
class paying too much is not solved by taxing anyone else more, at least not if
they don’t actually lower the taxes on the middle class, but oddly you will
NEVER hear a Democrat even mention lowering taxes for ANYONE. It’s even rate
that you’ll ever have a Republican actually vote for lowering either taxes or
spending! They simply can’t conceive of this notion. I still believe the reason
for this is because their economic world view is that the economy is a zero sum
game and because they believe the amount of money and products is fixed some
can only have if others do without. This is a faulty view of the economy, but
nonetheless the progressives both in the Democrat and Republican parties
believe this and as such their only solution is taxes. They can never envision
growing your way out of the situation, nor can they ever imagine cutting any
spending because again both Democrats and Republicans really do see the
government as the answer to all of society’s needs.
We all know what a horrible job the government does managing
our money yet the progressives of the nation, and the liberals, but those with
D and those with R before their name still want us to believe this isn’t really
the case.
It has never been the job of the government constitutionally
speaking to provide welfare, schools, or even police. Their job has never been
roads, their job constitutionally is not social security and retirement for
everyone. Their job is not to make sure everyone makes a fair wage (according to
their view of fair). Their job is not to provide abortions or contraceptives.
They have no constitutional mandate for any of these things, and according to
the constitution any power not given to them specifically is in the power of
the states.
Every time Obama speaks he prefers to cloud or completely
ignore the issue of separation of federal and state powers. He has already
shown his contempt for the constitution and just by reframing the argument by
the way he and other progressives talk about it, he is able to make people
forget that the federal government is not meant to oversee everything. It has
VERY LIMITED powers, or at least it’s supposed to according the constitution.
I only wish some people of his own party would start yelling
out at his speeches, “Stop the class warfare and tell us what you’re going to
do fix the problems beside “tax the rich!””. Somehow I don’t think this is ever
going to happen, but it would sure be nice to see some of the mindless robots
and progressives actually start using their brains and start showing enough
stones to recognize Obama is not FIXING ANYTHING! Either he doesn’t know how or
he doesn’t intend to even if he does not how. Either way the end effect is the
same. I’m sure this will be taken to be racist comment, but it is meant to be
just the opposite. I can’t help but wonder if it were not for the extreme
paranoia of being called a racist if people would still vote for Obama if he
was not black. I can’t help but think if he was white that he would be even
more reviled than Bush.
What he has done to the economy is shameful. What he has
done to divide the nation is shameful. The way he refuses to enforce the laws
of the land that he doesn’t like is shameful. The way he throws around
Executive Orders as though they were royal decrees is shameful. The way he
bypasses congress is criminal and it surprises me that congress does not make a
bigger issue out of it. The way he sees absolutely everything through the lens
of racism or class warfare is equally shameful and shows a very myopic view of
how things work.
I hope people will open their eyes and vote both Obama and
those congress people out of office who are either not doing their jobs or not
defending the constitution the way they swore to.
I think most people feel that the constitution can take care
of itself, after all it’s lasted this long. They don’t understand just how
easily it can be wiped away if the government officials determine they are just
going to ignore it. People should ask themselves what they would do if our
leaders just decided they were going to suspend elections!
Think it can’t happen here? Think again it has happened in
other democracies and we are certainly not immune what has happened in history.
If we do the same things they did we will have the same results they had.
Obama is a one message president. He can no longer promise
to do more of what he’s done because he hasn’t done a thing he promised to do
when he ran last time except to “TRANSFORM AMERICA”, that’s the only promise he’s
kept, but then he didn’t say it would a transformation for the good, just that
he’d do it. He has not kept a single promise he’s made and he has no more to
promise. Even though last time all of his promises were general and had NO
specifics, this time he can’t and hasn’t promised anything specific except to MAKE
THE RICH PAY. I don’t see this as enough of a reason to vote for the man as the
president of our great nation!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)