Politically Correct Words and Names

Reading some online news today (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/04/03/watch-how-arab-television-reporter-reacts-when-israeli-bystander-interrupts-her-live-report-with-funny-faces-and-chanting/) I ran into an interesting article declaring all the “offensive” names of places in Washington State. Of course we need to ban all these words from our language completely. I suppose we need to ban any offensive words. It has reach the point of the absurd and still people are pursuing it. One of the places that has to have its name changed is a place called Redman and Redman’s bluff. I suppose this means that Matt Redman will have to change his name. We’ll also have to get rid of the word Blacksmith, Blackout, Remove all 8 Balls from the pool table, oh yes and the red ones and the yellow ones and the brown ones and we certainly can’t use a white ball for the cue ball anymore because clearly that is the central and necessary ball in the game giving it prominence over all the other balls in the game. Guess we’ll have to start changing disease names as well such as Yellow Fever, we’ll need to start changing the names of bugs and animals as well after all it’s not fair to call them “black ants” or “red ants”. How far are we going to have to take this so no one has the slightest chance to be offended? Will astronomers have to do away with red stars?

I wonder will baseball have to do away with the shortstop, and can’t use shortcut anymore because of deference to little people, er, midgets, er dwarfs, argh yet another faux pas.

We’re clearly going to need to come up with new sentence structure, because every sentence has a subject in it and that harkens back to slavery. How DARE THEY?! This just shows how much every nation is centered on slavery! Someone needs to put a stop to this kind of use in language. It isn’t fair to constantly be using subjects like that!

Maybe they were mad about Redman Washington because it had the word “man” in it. But then that brings up another can of worms. Of course if we’re going to do away with “man” holes, Congress”man” Chairman, and the like, then don’t we need to do the same with other languages were every noun is either masculine or feminine. It’s not fair that a house in Spanish is feminine but a car is masculine; so will they have to start calling it “Caso” and “Cara”. Clearly other nationalities have far more of a problem to deal with than we do.

At what point are reasonable people going to start standing up to this politically correct madness? When will we say enough is enough? The writer is mad about Coon Creek and Coon Bay, don’t they realize that coon is short for raccoon, but then we can’t denigrate those little critters!

I guess we'll also have to rename the Black Hills of North Dakota, especially because they're also known as the "badlands" Can't have that can we? If we allow even one of these names to evade the vigilant gaze of the politically correct speech police to go uncorrected where will it stop.

It is clear from the article lnked above that we need to have every name, river, valley, city, noun, and any other place holder reviewed and have those names all changed at once. We dare not risk the slightest offence, or as they are calling them now, micro-aggression.

Have we lost our minds and our guts to at least use words!

The American people once a mighty and proud people always willing to speak their mind and use their freedom of speech have no become afraid to even use colors in their speech or words with double meaning because it has become assumed to be the negative meaning that is always intended. People wake up and take your freedom back. This is not to say we should say things just to be offensive, but since when to people have a RIGHT not to be offended? To my knowledge this is neither a human right nor a right in the constitution. Does anyone really think they can get through life without being offended or without offending others? Are we always to be at the mercy of those who wish to take offense at the slightest misstep in your words?

Government Definitions

I thought it would be fun to try to write down as many government definitions as I could. Clearly our representatives understand words in a completely different way than the rest of us.

1.      A Puddle: Government regulated waterway which requires permits to change even on your own property

2.      Unemployment: Only those looking for a job, able to work, and not able to find a job (This means if no one was working and no one was looking for a job we’d have 0% unemployment)

3.      Hate Speech: anything that offends anyone for any reason no matter how absurd

4.      Freedom of Speech: as long as it’s political correct and non-offensive

5.      Right to bear arms: as long as they are not guns the government doesn’t like, you get a permit (meaning you need permission from the government to have one and you need to pay them for that permission) this makes it a privilege not a right.

6.      Gun Control: Law abiding citizens must be restricted from owning guns because there are too many on the streets.

7.      Freedom of religion: you can express your religious views freely unless on government property, work for the government, receive money from the government and are not offending anyone with your beliefs.

8.      The 10^th Amendment: States shall have whatever powers the Federal Government deems they may have. All power resides with the Federal Government. Any state power can be taken by the Supreme Court.

9.      The 8^th Amendment: Excessive Fines: no problem with 371 fine for driving in the wrong lane during rush hour. $50 fine for not putting 75 cents in the meter the fine is more than 500 times the offense.

10.  Private Property: Do what you want with your property as long as you get permission from the government first and pay them for that permission. They used to call that a bribe.

11.  Government Waste: To politicians there is no such thing

12.  Public Property: property the public has no right to access and has no rights on. Property owned by the government not the people.

13.  Constitution of the United States: Something that hinders the government from doing whatever they want but doesn’t prevent it as long as they can find a new way to define the words found there.

14.  Consent of the People: I won the election so I can do what I want.

White Mob Attacks Black Family in Wilson Alabama

A mob of 20-to-30 white juveniles went on a rampage against a black family at a family-friendly event in Wilson Park in Florence, Alabama, allegedly slinging racial slurs as they fired at Taser at the husband and beat him.

The boy’s son, 14-year-old Brandon Dawes, was attacked, too, WHNT News reported.

“Randomly, they just hit me in the back of the head,” he said. “I didn’t think nothing of it at first because, well, I thought maybe somebody tripped or something.”

Juli Dawes, meanwhile, said her husband, Kevin, reached out to shield their son and then the group of juveniles started attacking him.

Get the book that documents racial violence in America, with hundreds of episodes in more than 80 American cities since 2010, where groups of blacks are assaulting, intimidating, stalking, threatening, shooting, stabbing and killing victims.

Husband and father Kevin said: “I got in between him and the attacker and told him to go toward the van and that’s when I started getting attacked,” the local news station reported.

Juli said she was in the van with her four-year-old, watching the scene unfold.

“My four-year-old said, ‘Look, Mommy, they’re dancing,’” she said, WHNT News reported. “I said, ‘No, baby, they’re not dancing, they’re fighting.’ Then I see my husband and he’s on the ground being Tased. … There’s this wall of people and there was nothing I could do.”

She also said the juveniles were “using slurs of race” during the assault, which took place at the community’s First Fridays event, billed as a family-friendly affair.

Florence Police Chief Ron Tyler said investigators are considering whether or not to regard the incident as a hate crime.

“We are considering all angles,” he said, AL.com reported. “There are no set of circumstances that would ever justify an unprovoked attack by a group of thugs, and we will not allow any group to hijack the family friendly First Fridays event.”

Kevin suffered a fractured eye socket and several taser burns while Brandon, the 14-year-old, suffered unspecified minor injuries. AL.com reported the two were both attacked in the face and have consulted a surgeon to deal with the wounds.

Police have asked for help identifying the suspects.

AL.com reported the incident is the second possible hate crime this month. The other incident at a Huntsville club a few days ago involved an attack on a “gay” man who was similarly injured in the face. The victim in that incident said he was assaulted because he was gay, though police didn’t immediately record the attack as a hate crime.

Oh, my apologies, I got the colors mixed up in the story... the juvenile mob was black and the family was white. Are you still outraged? see story at http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/white-family-beaten-shot-with-taser-by-black-mob/?cat_orig=us

Jonathan Gruber A Story to be Ignored

It seems almost the entire media is doing everything they can to ignore any of the now recurring news coming out about Jonathan Gruber calling the American people stupid and declaring that they had to lie to the American people to pass Obamacare. As one commentator mentioned the real reason they had to lie to the American people is that they were afraid that to tell the truth would have incurred a great uprising against this truly horrible bill.

What still isn’t coming out is how much the bill seems to have really been designed to ruin both healthcare as well as the American economy. If it was not designed intentionally to harm the economy then it means that the people who were really the boobs and dopes were the people creating the program and foisting it on the rest of us.

Gruber would have had us believe that it was just a slip the first time, and then maybe that he misspoke the second time, but after now having at least 4 videos come out with him saying the same thing on 4 different occasions it is clear it was not accidently or just careless speech. What he said he meant to say or he would not have said it over and over. Essentially he was trying to educate the groups he was speaking to on how to deceive those you were trying force something on you knew they wouldn’t like. He recommended way was to just lie to them. Sadly he and most all Democrats and probably progressive Republicans are more than aware that once something like this gets pushed through it is never really repealed. Once the Republicans found they had won the senate they have completely stopped talking about repealing Obamacare, instead what they are now talking about is ways to improve it or begin the decades long process of “fine tuning” it. All they are willing to do is make amendments to it with minor changes.

The media is doing the same thing with this that they do with any story or news that doesn’t fit with the story they want to push. In this case it is a huge black eye. If the media really wanted to increase their readership and their listeners the Gruber story would certainly be the way to do it. The problem is they just can’t bring themselves to report anything that would even appear to support a major story reported with Fox. They’re more than willing to report what each other reports but they will certainly not report what Fox News does.

Really when you think about it not only does Gruber think Americans are stupid so do all the Democrats as they lie about knowing him or knowing what he was doing. They were all in on it and these are known facts. I’m not saying the Republicans are any better. They continually use what they prefer to call the language of politics to sell things to the American people they also know are bad for us. They purposely use confusing terms such as deficit and debt. The most recent case for Republicans is McConnell making the statement that they won’t use the power of the purse and certainly won’t shut down the government because we have to pay our debts. These 2 things are completely unrelated. You can s hut down the government and still pay your debts. This is like saying if you stop paying your employees you can pay vendors, or your loans. Of if you stop paying your vendors for their service that you can’t pay your employees or your bank loans. These things are not necessarily dependent on each other. Granted in business if you have no employees you will go out of business, but the government doesn’t have this problem. The money comes in whether they provide services or not. They do not work for their money they merely demand it from us and we must pay it.

Our politician understand that the American people have come to accept and even expect that the representatives they choose are going to lie to them and in this sense Americans are most certainly stupid. It seems Americans can’t be bothered to elect moral and ethical representatives. Maybe they don’t see the value of morality, but then this is also stupid.

At the same time Gruber’s remarks indicate that the lies were necessary because even stupid Americans wouldn’t stand for what they were doing if it became known clearly just what that was. Of course the media does everything they can to not uncover these things. They support lying to and deceiving the American people. A perfect example of the media’s complicit deception is how they refuse to cover the story of Gruber. Hiding information from people who need to know it is no different than giving them misinformation.

It is clear the media are not interested in covering this story even though it would probably revive their sagging sales. They don’t seem to care as much about their sales as they do about their ideology. In many respects this is much like Obama. He does not care what happens to his presidency, or even the presidency in general. He doesn’t care about going down in history as a great president. I believe he cares more about going down in history as the man that completely changed America. He said he would do this and so far he has done it. He has been more effective almost completely by himself than any other individual or group in our history of utterly changing our nation. One has to wonder if anyone will make any serious effort to actually stop the utter destruction of our nation.

It is clear we have a limited time to deal with the destruction of this president. He is all too well aware that major things such as the things he’s doing don’t get undone easily if at all; they take on a momentum of their own and once started there is little anyone can do about them.

Our media understand that it is as equally as powerful not reporting a story as to report a lie. In some respects it may be more powerful because you cannot be caught in a lie when you just didn’t say anything. Lying has become so common for those in political office that it doesn’t even seem to be a story anymore. I wonder sometimes if the media doesn’t understand just how big it could be for whatever news outlet decided to start reporting all the lies and deceptions of our government and representatives.

Now they are all busy lying about even knowing Gruber even though there are tons of tapes and video of them supporting him and extoling him as the go to man for Obamacare. We are now up to 6 videos of Gruber saying how they had to deceive the American people and as well as how the American people are stupid.

Why is it that the media including Fox News focuses on Gruber’s remarks about the American people being stupid rather than focusing on the fact that they had to deceive the American people? Why do they consider an insult worse than a moral or ethical issue? I for once consider lying and deceit far worse than name calling.

Moderate Muslim Misnomer

American media refuses to write or speak out about what Islam is. Since the first major attack on the United States by Muslims both our media and our representatives have refused to call this what it is. They refuse to admit most Muslims believe in and support what the media radical Islam. Of course they even hate to use that term unless they are forced to. When they are finally forced to use that term they invariably feel the need to add a disclaimer about how this does not include all Muslims and how that majority of Muslims do not support the views or methods of the moderates.

Those who do such things are clearly uninformed and not interested in getting informed. They can’t be bothered to actually read the writings of Islam. They can’t be bothered to do any actual investigative reporting by going to mosques or actually asking regular Muslims what they believe. What they do instead is interview the “really” radical Muslims or label any Muslims they do interview as being radical as though there are so many others out there that are moderate. Yet in all of this they are always unable to find more than one Muslim who is actually willing to truly condemn what the radicals are doing.

We need only take a few looks at the morality expressed in the quran to understand how warped it is. It is not about action but only about intention which is also never directly expressed as to its nature:

Surah 2 (The Cow)

[225] Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing.

A search on such words as love and peace reveal not a single verse in the quran that specifically tells the followers of Islam to live in peace, or to seek peace with others who are not Muslims. It does not tell them to love them or to show love toward them. Those who would tell you that Islam is a religion of peace never quote a single verse from the quran to demonstrate this because no such verse exists. This is something they make up either because they are basically people of good character and conscience or because it is part of the holy deception authorized in the quran for the sake of furthering the cause of allah which allows for almost every kind of deception or action by his followers.

When it speaks of peace in the quran it is always in relationship to allah either from him or toward him. In a few cases it also is between Muslims but even those references are quite rare. To understand what a Islam means by peace you must understand that to them peace will reign when there are either no infidels or all infidels have been forced to submit; short of this there can be no peace in Islam. So when you hear them talk of it as a religion of peace you must always keep in mind what they mean by it instead of assuming they mean the same thing you mean when you use that word. This is part of the deception. They know that infidels are more than willing to apply their own meaning to Muslim terms and they are more than willing to take advantage of that.

It is for this reason that you cannot find any “moderate Muslims” to condemn what the “radicals” are doing. They can’t condemn it because they know there is nothing in the quran that condemns what they’re doing. Even when you run into a “moderate” who is willing to speak out against them, they never quote from any of the quran anything to support what they say is wrong. Their only offense is based as I mentioned on an innate sense of morality and conscience that is outside the quran. Their mind, soul and spirit has not been so corrupted by the quran and Islam that they don’t still recognize what is right and good.

Ask yourself another question. Compare a true religion of peace and a false one. Is there a single person who would stand outside a mosque with foul pictures or depictions of their prophet or allah without fear of retribution? At the same time would anyone fear to do the same in front of a christian church? 

Consider as well. Why is it that any criticism of Mohammad is always assumed to mean the prophet in spite of the fact that Mohammad is the most common name in Islam. So why is it assumed you are talking about the prophet, instead of Mohammad the shoemaker, or Mohammad the bus driver. Consider the cartoonists that have a fatwa on their heads for life. They drew pictures of a guy name Mohammad who was Arab looking and it was assumed they spoke of the prophet instead of one of his followers mouthing the words of the prophet or are we not allowed to criticize his followers without a death sentence?

 

I wish to welcome any comments to this article, but please if you all you can do is name call, ridicule, call me islamophobic or a bigot, I won’t take your comments seriously. If you actually have something from the quran to demonstrate the peaceful loving religion Islam is then I certainly wish to hear from you. Please make sure what you quote is in context. It seems just not believing is enough of a reason to have your head cut off.

Republicans Short-Sighted

It seems Republicans are short-sighted, have very short memories or both. Every time the Democrats have pushed something off till after an election they did it knowing they were probably going to lose fairly big in that election and the strategy was to push it off so when it went into effect the Republicans would get the blame for the consequences. If they happened to win then they would just mitigate the situation by voting it down or out.

On top of the consequences should they win the senate or the presidency, they also seem not to care about the constitution or the law at all. They are as bad as the Democrats. They should be pushing to make sure everything is implemented on schedule as it was written. The Democrats forced this thing down our throats. The Republicans seem to have no real intent to get rid of it. They should be forcing the Democrats to let it stand as it was written so the American people realize just how bad this thing is. It feels like the Republicans have some hope of fixing it with the excuse that it’s gone too far now to repeal. This was the same thing that happened with Social Security.

Republicans seem to be too stupid to do these things. They talk about repealing Obamacare but even if they won both the Senate and the House and the presidency I somehow doubt they are going to repeal Obamacare. They act like the minority even when they’re in the majority. Instead they will stupidly try to “fix” Obamacare. Of course when all the onerous regulations, taxes and fees, as well as the price increases continue for the healthcare they will get the blame and they’ll be kicked out of office in the next election with everything still in place.

The only way this turns into a win for Republicans is if they actually do repeal Obamacare. They have not shown the grit to do this so I don’t think they’re going to find their spines when it finally comes about.

If Republicans were serious about getting rid of Obamacare and shrinking government they wouldn’t be doing everything they can to hurt Tea Party candidates. They would be doing everything they can to get all the help they can, including from the Tea Party to get Republicans and especially true conservatives elected. The Republicans for the most part, at least the ones we have in congress right now are not really conservatives at all, they are progressives. The only differences between them and Democrats is that they are progressive-lite. They are still for big government and they still think they know better what the American people need than the American people do.

The Republicans are failing the American people in the worst way. At least with the Democrats they don’t hide the fact that for the most part they are communists and socialists that believe in big government. They use all the language of the Marxists and continually remind us how they are for the downtrodden.

Republicans don’t really want to win, they are more than happy to lose as long as the Tea Party and the American people they represent don’t win and show them for what they really are. I suppose they don’t think the American people really know who they are. The nation is imploding and still all they want to do is play their absurd political games. The fact that our Republican representatives are willing to play such games with our lives for the sake of their power and their idea of how to turn this country into a Utopia is appalling and every leader that feels this way should be kicked out of office at the first available opportunity. They clearly are not looking out for our good. Do they really believe all these things they’re “offering” us, read shoving down our throats are free? It seems too many Americans feel what the government gives us is free, but the reality is they only offer us things out of what they take from us in taxes in the first place. We still pay for it! 

Law Makers Stunned by Revelations of IRS Corruption!

Are they kidding? So they really didn’t know this was going on or seriously suspect it? Why should they be stunned? They’ve known this is going for a long time. If they didn’t know it was going on then why all the investigations? They just couldn’t prove it or just didn’t want to. Now that it’s really coming out, they’re all actin like they’re stunned this was happening. This includes the Republicans.

This is sham! They should be saying, “We knew it!” instead of behaving as though they are stunned. After everything that’s come out they’re really “STUNNED” about what the IRS was doing? Give me a break!

Would they also be stunned about Fast and Furious, of which we hear nothing anymore? Would they also be stunned about Benghazi Revelations? 

If our leaders are really that clueless about what's going on under their watch then they don't deserve to be in charge of anything! These people all need to be voted out of office at the first possible opportunity.

Does anyone really believe their representative is doing such an amazing job that they deserve a 50th term?! Excuse the hyperbole but it's hard to believe that Americans keep voting the same knuckleheads back into office over and over seeing how they are actually administering things.

Now they are sending the Feds after citizens in Montana, and Nevada for things that have nothing to do with the FEDERAL government. They may be things of concern to the states, but they certainly don't fall under federal jurisdiction.

We really need to get these people and the federal government out of our lives. They behave as though they're doing everything for our good and our safety. Now they want to take control of ALL the water in the United States through the EPA and Clean Water Act. Maybe they're stunned about that too, but they're not doing anything about it.

No matter who your representative is you should seriously consider voting them out of office. Even if you're married to your party there is always someone else from the same party running against them. If no one votes for the incumbent they will lose. Could a new person really do a worse job, and if they did they would be on notice from what happened to their predecessor that they won't be in office for a second term.

If we got rid of ALL the insiders they'd actually have to start talking to each other again to figure out what they were really going to do instead of allowing a few leaders in each party to dictate to the rest how they should vote and how they better act if they want to get anywhere with the "insiders".