Moderate Muslim Misnomer

American media refuses to write or speak out about what Islam is. Since the first major attack on the United States by Muslims both our media and our representatives have refused to call this what it is. They refuse to admit most Muslims believe in and support what the media radical Islam. Of course they even hate to use that term unless they are forced to. When they are finally forced to use that term they invariably feel the need to add a disclaimer about how this does not include all Muslims and how that majority of Muslims do not support the views or methods of the moderates.

Those who do such things are clearly uninformed and not interested in getting informed. They can’t be bothered to actually read the writings of Islam. They can’t be bothered to do any actual investigative reporting by going to mosques or actually asking regular Muslims what they believe. What they do instead is interview the “really” radical Muslims or label any Muslims they do interview as being radical as though there are so many others out there that are moderate. Yet in all of this they are always unable to find more than one Muslim who is actually willing to truly condemn what the radicals are doing.

We need only take a few looks at the morality expressed in the quran to understand how warped it is. It is not about action but only about intention which is also never directly expressed as to its nature:

Surah 2 (The Cow)

[225] Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing.

A search on such words as love and peace reveal not a single verse in the quran that specifically tells the followers of Islam to live in peace, or to seek peace with others who are not Muslims. It does not tell them to love them or to show love toward them. Those who would tell you that Islam is a religion of peace never quote a single verse from the quran to demonstrate this because no such verse exists. This is something they make up either because they are basically people of good character and conscience or because it is part of the holy deception authorized in the quran for the sake of furthering the cause of allah which allows for almost every kind of deception or action by his followers.

When it speaks of peace in the quran it is always in relationship to allah either from him or toward him. In a few cases it also is between Muslims but even those references are quite rare. To understand what a Islam means by peace you must understand that to them peace will reign when there are either no infidels or all infidels have been forced to submit; short of this there can be no peace in Islam. So when you hear them talk of it as a religion of peace you must always keep in mind what they mean by it instead of assuming they mean the same thing you mean when you use that word. This is part of the deception. They know that infidels are more than willing to apply their own meaning to Muslim terms and they are more than willing to take advantage of that.

It is for this reason that you cannot find any “moderate Muslims” to condemn what the “radicals” are doing. They can’t condemn it because they know there is nothing in the quran that condemns what they’re doing. Even when you run into a “moderate” who is willing to speak out against them, they never quote from any of the quran anything to support what they say is wrong. Their only offense is based as I mentioned on an innate sense of morality and conscience that is outside the quran. Their mind, soul and spirit has not been so corrupted by the quran and Islam that they don’t still recognize what is right and good.

Ask yourself another question. Compare a true religion of peace and a false one. Is there a single person who would stand outside a mosque with foul pictures or depictions of their prophet or allah without fear of retribution? At the same time would anyone fear to do the same in front of a christian church? 

Consider as well. Why is it that any criticism of Mohammad is always assumed to mean the prophet in spite of the fact that Mohammad is the most common name in Islam. So why is it assumed you are talking about the prophet, instead of Mohammad the shoemaker, or Mohammad the bus driver. Consider the cartoonists that have a fatwa on their heads for life. They drew pictures of a guy name Mohammad who was Arab looking and it was assumed they spoke of the prophet instead of one of his followers mouthing the words of the prophet or are we not allowed to criticize his followers without a death sentence?

 

I wish to welcome any comments to this article, but please if you all you can do is name call, ridicule, call me islamophobic or a bigot, I won’t take your comments seriously. If you actually have something from the quran to demonstrate the peaceful loving religion Islam is then I certainly wish to hear from you. Please make sure what you quote is in context. It seems just not believing is enough of a reason to have your head cut off.