The 9th Circuit Court in California has determined that the right to private property no longer exists here. They have said that police can now come on your property (driveway) and plant GPS devices on your car to track you wherever you go. Their reasoning is that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy there.
It seems where judges are concerned if you can see it then it's not private. I can't help but wonder how those same judges would feel if people just came up on their driveway and put other things on their cars. After all they have no reasonable right to expect those things not to be tampered with since they are all visible. The fact that they own it no longer means anything to those judges. I can only assume this means they don't mind if people come on to their property as long or track where they go and what they do.
I have to admit I wouldn't mind doing that on a regular basis to all of those judges since they no longer feel they have any reasonable expectation of privacy on any part of their property visible to the public.
It always surprises me when judges make such clearly unconstitutional judgments that they are not taken to court and held culpable for the damages they've allowed by their rulings. It also surprises me that more people don't do just what I've suggested above. They should be hounded about this till they see just how wrong they are. Do these men and women have no common sense whatever? Do they really care to defend and protect the constitution according to their oath or are they determined to rewrite the parts of it they don't like?
No comments:
Post a Comment