The idea that Obama is nearly unbeatable even by such news organizations as Fox News as well as most of the right leaning talk shows is mind-boggling. I would expect this from the left who feel that Obama can do no wrong, but to listen to the right they think they are going to have some kind of war on their hands. This is not to say that they should take things seriously, but it also shouldn’t be taken that he has a lock on this thing unless some Abraham Lincoln or George Washington shows up on the scene.
Aren’t these the same people who for so long have mentioned all the things wrong that he’s been doing? Have they forgotten all these things? All they need to ask themselves is what has he done right? Has he fixed the economy? Are jobs coming back? What of the price of gas? What about the price of food? What about the oil drilling he stopped in the gulf and the rest of the country for that matter, while turning right around and giving Brazil the right to drill in our waters when we don’t have that right ourselves? What about the takeover of 1/6th of the economy with health care? What about his decision to declare war on Libya without the consent of congress?
The list of outrages and shortcomings grows by the day. What about all the communists he has in office? What about using the EPA to regulate things he couldn’t get passed by law? What about Sebilius deciding by fiat that no insurance company can raise their rates by more than 10%? There is no law in place this is just some executive decision. What about how the stimulus has failed? What about the debt now at 14.5 trillion dollars? What about the continuous onslaught on big and small business. What about his lack of response to the flooding, the tornadoes, and other natural disasters? These are things they wouldn’t leave Bush alone for. What about the way he’s treated everyone of our allies or at least our best allies, England, and Israel. What about bowing to foreign kings,
What about his constant apologies to the rest of the world for how bad the United States is? What about His disrespect to foreign dignitaries such as PM Netanyahu?
Actually it seems about the only thing the president has been able to do right so far was finally getting Osama Bin Laden and even this probably wouldn’t have happened without the interrogations at Guantanamo.
Is there actually any outstanding policy or decision that anyone can point to that really endears him to the American public? I certainly can’t think of any!
It is time for the republicans to stop their whining about how unbeatable the president is and get to work. The only reason they wouldn’t be able to beat him is if all they can do is put in front of us another Obama Lite much like McCain was. They keep talking about losing the center. Do they not know where the center stands? Do they not get that the center is more toward the right than the extreme left. Obama is certainly not even close to the center! Look at his policies and you can see that with only the briefest of examinations!
Republicans are so wimpy? They cower or become defensive when they are called racists. It is as though they are afraid of saying anything direct or offensive. There is no reason for this. If they lose this election it will only be because they are wimps.
They behave as though this election was Obama’s to lose. If anything this election is the republicans to lose. I fear they will do just that though because the elite republicans can’t stand anything out of their control any more than the democrats can. Consider what happened in Maryland when the candidate the republicans wanted, who was a milk toast, RINO didn’t win. They gave no support for the only remaining republican. They didn’t even bother to help her fight. They just declared she didn’t have a chance and left her to hang in the wind, then smugly covered her loss as an “I told you so!” As if to say, “See how much you need us”. This is the insane thinking of the Washington elite. They were in some ways even more against her than the opposition party.
I can’t help but wonder if something similar wouldn’t happen again if it was Palin or Cain that were the clear front runners. I wonder if they wouldn’t sabotage their own campaign once again just to prove a point.
As I have said many times, the republicans are no better than the democrats. They both seem to want the same things, it’s just that the democrats want it now and the republican though not proposing some of the stuff the democrats do, will still give those things enough support to see them become law. They have yet to mount any firm resolve against some, any, of the Supreme Court nominees.
Czars now seem to be as accepted as though they were in the constitution. They did not raise any kind of a stink of sending yet more troops to Libya and starting yet another war. They just let Obama do it. It is like they are either afraid to confront him about anything he wants to do or they are actually in agreement with him on those things.
If they lose it will be for these reasons not because Obama was so unbeatable.
Why is there no discussion about the bailout any longer. Consider for just a moment what really happened... The government created money out of thin air (tax payer money, since this is the only money the government really has), Then lent it to banks so they could lend it to us at interest to pay back the government. Just take the word government out of that, wince we are the government and you'll realize how insane this situation is. Our leaders took our money, to lend end to banks, who then lend us back our money at interest, to pay the government back, but that money never comes back to our pockets. This means they're just taking out money and then charging us interest on our own money.
And the guy who did this is the guy that's so unbeatable? If any company did this they'd be worried about going to jail, not feeling sure that they'd get elected back to the board again.
Friday, May 27, 2011
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Palestinian Hypocrisy
Why is it there is more pressure put on Israel to give up land which is clearly essential to their national security while there is almost no pressure put on Zuhri to simply renounce his position regarding the right of Israel to exist? All that is being asked of him is that he changes his political position. He’s not being asked to give them aid, or to give up any of their land to the Jews as a show of good faith. Basically nothing is being asked of them except to say that they agree that Israel has a right to exist, but even this they won’t do. This alone ought to speak volumes to the world, but still the world blames the Jews and feel that they are the ones who are the ones who won’t stand for what is right.
It mystifies me why the rest of the world cannot see the absurdity of this position. They cannot see how crazy it is for the Jews to give up land which really does rightfully belong to them for the sake of a supposed peace with a group of people who will not even renounce their view that these people have no right to a nation of their own at all. They demand from a nation, which has been a nation in that same place back as far as 4000 years ago, while the Palestinians did not even exist as a people even 100 years ago. Yet it is the Palestinians that feel they have the right to be there as well as the right to get rid of the Jews from the face of the earth and certainly from the Middle East.
Zuhri’s position is clearly untenable yet the world expects every to bow to him and give him what he wants, but they place not even the demand to recognize that Israel has a right to exist. The continuous denial on the part of the world to recognize the Palestinians and Hamas for what they are is mystifying. People treat the Palestinians the way they do the terrorists. Everyone is afraid to call them what they are to speak openly about what their goals are. They have not one single time actually given even one inch toward peace. They have continual demands, but offer nothing in trade and when they do offer it they don’t keep their deal even when it comes to something as simple as a cease fire. They have chosen to ally themselves with terrorist groups such as Hamas and the PLO at every chance. They don’t renounce them. They chose them chose them to represent them and to bargain for them.
Enough of making excuses they do this because they’re afraid of the “minority” of Muslims that are extremists. Several opportunities have come up for them to pick someone else to represent them, but they always all in with the terrorists. For some reason we feel the continual need to add the obvious statement that no all Palestinians are terrorists, or not all Muslims are extremists, but yet no one can point to any that are truly reasonable. By any I don’t mean a single one… I mean one of the mass of moderates the politically correct claims exist. Yet they are lucky if they can find even a handful of individuals that are actually moderate.
It is time to call upon the Palestinians and those who support them to show some concrete desire for peace. If they will not show even in words that they are willing to have peace and pay at least some price for that peace; if they are not willing to offer anything except to say they want peace then it is time for us to withdraw any support of their position. If they feel we are no longer supporting them morally I cannot help but believe they will begin to rethink their position. At this point they have received unwavering support from the whole world. Everyone has continually taken their side against the Jews. They have been supported financially more per capita than any other nation on earth and yet we still apply none of the pressure we could.
The Palestinians do not change their positions because as long as they have support they know they don't need to. We have yet to see any nation withdraw or even give the appearance of withdrawing their support from the Palestinians in spite of all they have done. yet we have threatened to do that to Israel over and over and many nations have withdrawn their support.
Why are nations so afraid to try something new to pressure the Palestinians to come to the bargaining table in earnest? Why is it that the Palestinians are never pressured for more concessions. They are always viewed as being attacked by Israel even though this has never happened except when Israel has been attacked first. There is not one instance of preemptive and uncalled for attacks on Palestinians and most especially eeven when they have been attacked in retaliation the targets are never civilians. Does this mean civilians are never injured? Certainly not. It would be impossible not have injure at least a few when the Muslims use them as shields.
It is time for the nations to call upon the Palestinians to do their part. They are always viewed as those who are continually attacked but they are actually the ones that are doing the attacking and doing it almost incessantly.
It mystifies me why the rest of the world cannot see the absurdity of this position. They cannot see how crazy it is for the Jews to give up land which really does rightfully belong to them for the sake of a supposed peace with a group of people who will not even renounce their view that these people have no right to a nation of their own at all. They demand from a nation, which has been a nation in that same place back as far as 4000 years ago, while the Palestinians did not even exist as a people even 100 years ago. Yet it is the Palestinians that feel they have the right to be there as well as the right to get rid of the Jews from the face of the earth and certainly from the Middle East.
Zuhri’s position is clearly untenable yet the world expects every to bow to him and give him what he wants, but they place not even the demand to recognize that Israel has a right to exist. The continuous denial on the part of the world to recognize the Palestinians and Hamas for what they are is mystifying. People treat the Palestinians the way they do the terrorists. Everyone is afraid to call them what they are to speak openly about what their goals are. They have not one single time actually given even one inch toward peace. They have continual demands, but offer nothing in trade and when they do offer it they don’t keep their deal even when it comes to something as simple as a cease fire. They have chosen to ally themselves with terrorist groups such as Hamas and the PLO at every chance. They don’t renounce them. They chose them chose them to represent them and to bargain for them.
Enough of making excuses they do this because they’re afraid of the “minority” of Muslims that are extremists. Several opportunities have come up for them to pick someone else to represent them, but they always all in with the terrorists. For some reason we feel the continual need to add the obvious statement that no all Palestinians are terrorists, or not all Muslims are extremists, but yet no one can point to any that are truly reasonable. By any I don’t mean a single one… I mean one of the mass of moderates the politically correct claims exist. Yet they are lucky if they can find even a handful of individuals that are actually moderate.
It is time to call upon the Palestinians and those who support them to show some concrete desire for peace. If they will not show even in words that they are willing to have peace and pay at least some price for that peace; if they are not willing to offer anything except to say they want peace then it is time for us to withdraw any support of their position. If they feel we are no longer supporting them morally I cannot help but believe they will begin to rethink their position. At this point they have received unwavering support from the whole world. Everyone has continually taken their side against the Jews. They have been supported financially more per capita than any other nation on earth and yet we still apply none of the pressure we could.
The Palestinians do not change their positions because as long as they have support they know they don't need to. We have yet to see any nation withdraw or even give the appearance of withdrawing their support from the Palestinians in spite of all they have done. yet we have threatened to do that to Israel over and over and many nations have withdrawn their support.
Why are nations so afraid to try something new to pressure the Palestinians to come to the bargaining table in earnest? Why is it that the Palestinians are never pressured for more concessions. They are always viewed as being attacked by Israel even though this has never happened except when Israel has been attacked first. There is not one instance of preemptive and uncalled for attacks on Palestinians and most especially eeven when they have been attacked in retaliation the targets are never civilians. Does this mean civilians are never injured? Certainly not. It would be impossible not have injure at least a few when the Muslims use them as shields.
It is time for the nations to call upon the Palestinians to do their part. They are always viewed as those who are continually attacked but they are actually the ones that are doing the attacking and doing it almost incessantly.
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
More Fear Mongering
You have to wonder about the intelligence of our media and our leaders, but probably more even about the media. Now the media is spreading fear about the possibility of attacks on our trains.
For some unknown reason whether something is happening or not, or whether terrorists have thought of an idea of something to target our media seems intent on giving them idea, not only of targets but also of their weaknesses.
Our media seems to think that everything should be absolutely safe, much like most Americans. As Americans we seem to feel there should be no risk in life. If there is any risk whatever to health, injury, or death it is assumed that we need to put regulations and systems in place to prevent it completely.
It has reached the point where companies are required to put such ridiculous messages on their products as not making toast in your bathtub, or not swallowing your pen. Not only does it show how stupid the companies are but also how stupid they think the people are. If you're busy making toast in your bathtub while taking a bath you deserve to be electrocuted.
Now the media has become focused on trains which Osama was thinking about targeting. I can't help but wonder if he'd mentioned coffee shops if you would be required to be searched when you went in a coffee shop, or may grocery stores. After all these certainly have no security. The list goes on and on.
We should not be more afraid that criminals and terrorists are going to do something to us than they are to do it!
It amazes me that people seem to feel that everyone else is responsible for their safety and to resolve their problems. As we all know we live in a litigious society, where everyone seeks to sue someone else every time they have a problem or get injured. What has happened to the sense of personal responsibility.
If a child plays with matches and gets burned the parent is to blame. If a person doesn't pay their bills they're not responsible because they didn't get the bill in the mail... as thought hey didn't know they used the service that month and they were still expected to pay. This list goes on and on.
Yes, some things are genuinely the responsibility or fault of another, but things have gone to a ridiculous level and the media doesn't help matters.
We should stick with what bush said in the first place. If some country is harboring terrorist and terrorists from that nation attack us then all bets are off! And actually do it!
We are told not all Muslims are terrorists, but not one media outlet can seem to find any group of Muslims that oppose and speak out against the terrorists or is openly seeking out and prosecuting the terrorists. So why would they say what they say. Because they are too politically correct. Sadly they think of Islam like being German or Japanese. They do not understand being Muslim is more like being a Nazi or a Kamakazi. It is a belief system that has a world view that drives it and thus will continue to cause the problems.
We would do better to say that not all Arabs are terrorists. Their nationality doesn't mean they hold to the belief system, but the belief system is the belief system and that is what drives the behavior. No one would debate that Nazis were all guilty of wanting to exterminate the Jews or any of the other non white races. That is what defined them as Nazis. That of course didn't mean that all Germans were Nazis, but all Nazis did believe in the above among other things and needed to be fought against wherever they were found.
We need to stop being so defensive and stop making ourselves prisoners in our own houses cowering in fear and start making these criminals and terrorists afraid of retaliation. If they hide behind "innocents" as Osama did then we do what it takes to get them. Yes we may kill a few innocents but we will get the enemy and no more innocents will suffer under them.
Not only would this be the case, but then the "innocents" might actually find the courage to assist in their own liberation. Right now they know we won't do anything and they do not stand up against the terrorists either.
For the trains, the coffee shops, the planes, and every other possible target and go after the people that would attack them.
As I've said, all the people touting that there are moderate Muslims that don't support terrorism have yet to produce this "large" number of moderates that disagree with them.
I challenge any one of these people to pick the Mosque of their choice and go stand in front of it and make fun of Allah, or Mohammed. They certainly would have no fear of doing something similar in front of a church because they really do know that extremists in Christianity are really the minority and the exception. They also know in spite of their political correctness that the moderates in Islam are almost non-existent.
Let's stop playing games about this and address the issue as it really is.
You don't need to ask Muslims what they believe. All you have to do is read the Koran. Just like reading the Bible will tell you what most Christians believe.
For some unknown reason whether something is happening or not, or whether terrorists have thought of an idea of something to target our media seems intent on giving them idea, not only of targets but also of their weaknesses.
Our media seems to think that everything should be absolutely safe, much like most Americans. As Americans we seem to feel there should be no risk in life. If there is any risk whatever to health, injury, or death it is assumed that we need to put regulations and systems in place to prevent it completely.
It has reached the point where companies are required to put such ridiculous messages on their products as not making toast in your bathtub, or not swallowing your pen. Not only does it show how stupid the companies are but also how stupid they think the people are. If you're busy making toast in your bathtub while taking a bath you deserve to be electrocuted.
Now the media has become focused on trains which Osama was thinking about targeting. I can't help but wonder if he'd mentioned coffee shops if you would be required to be searched when you went in a coffee shop, or may grocery stores. After all these certainly have no security. The list goes on and on.
We should not be more afraid that criminals and terrorists are going to do something to us than they are to do it!
It amazes me that people seem to feel that everyone else is responsible for their safety and to resolve their problems. As we all know we live in a litigious society, where everyone seeks to sue someone else every time they have a problem or get injured. What has happened to the sense of personal responsibility.
If a child plays with matches and gets burned the parent is to blame. If a person doesn't pay their bills they're not responsible because they didn't get the bill in the mail... as thought hey didn't know they used the service that month and they were still expected to pay. This list goes on and on.
Yes, some things are genuinely the responsibility or fault of another, but things have gone to a ridiculous level and the media doesn't help matters.
We should stick with what bush said in the first place. If some country is harboring terrorist and terrorists from that nation attack us then all bets are off! And actually do it!
We are told not all Muslims are terrorists, but not one media outlet can seem to find any group of Muslims that oppose and speak out against the terrorists or is openly seeking out and prosecuting the terrorists. So why would they say what they say. Because they are too politically correct. Sadly they think of Islam like being German or Japanese. They do not understand being Muslim is more like being a Nazi or a Kamakazi. It is a belief system that has a world view that drives it and thus will continue to cause the problems.
We would do better to say that not all Arabs are terrorists. Their nationality doesn't mean they hold to the belief system, but the belief system is the belief system and that is what drives the behavior. No one would debate that Nazis were all guilty of wanting to exterminate the Jews or any of the other non white races. That is what defined them as Nazis. That of course didn't mean that all Germans were Nazis, but all Nazis did believe in the above among other things and needed to be fought against wherever they were found.
We need to stop being so defensive and stop making ourselves prisoners in our own houses cowering in fear and start making these criminals and terrorists afraid of retaliation. If they hide behind "innocents" as Osama did then we do what it takes to get them. Yes we may kill a few innocents but we will get the enemy and no more innocents will suffer under them.
Not only would this be the case, but then the "innocents" might actually find the courage to assist in their own liberation. Right now they know we won't do anything and they do not stand up against the terrorists either.
For the trains, the coffee shops, the planes, and every other possible target and go after the people that would attack them.
As I've said, all the people touting that there are moderate Muslims that don't support terrorism have yet to produce this "large" number of moderates that disagree with them.
I challenge any one of these people to pick the Mosque of their choice and go stand in front of it and make fun of Allah, or Mohammed. They certainly would have no fear of doing something similar in front of a church because they really do know that extremists in Christianity are really the minority and the exception. They also know in spite of their political correctness that the moderates in Islam are almost non-existent.
Let's stop playing games about this and address the issue as it really is.
You don't need to ask Muslims what they believe. All you have to do is read the Koran. Just like reading the Bible will tell you what most Christians believe.
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Teaching Treason!
There are so many things wrong about this story its frightening. A women at a school board meeting in Arizona had questions for the board about a book that is being used to teach children as early as 3rd grade. What was appalling wasn't even so much the use of all the profanity in the books, but all the talk of revolution against the government. The state constitution at the least declares that the schools can not teach stuff about bringing down the government and the like. From the reading the woman did it was clear it was a call to arms against the government. This is the first thing that is so very wrong about this, but everything that follows only increases the severity of what is going on.
When the woman began to read all the curse words contained in the book used to teach third graders one of the board members asked her to refrain because there might be young people present! But wait isn't this book designed to be read by third graders. So at this point the woman cowered and apologized for the use of the language instead of asking the board member to explain that if he thought it was wrong it would certainly mean that such a book should not be used in the class room. But it never went there. Many of the people in the audience immediately recognized the hypocrisy of the board member regarding this.
It is one thing to insist the book stop being used, but should the people using the book and those who designated the book be questioned and even asked to resign for the seditious ways? Why is this kind of treason or sedition being allowed to be taught? Why are the teachers not questioned as well as the administrators who decided this book should be used? Why is there no call for resignation? What about the constitution of the state forbidding sedition to be taught in the classroom?
All of these are obvious questions, yet you can be sure that about the only thing that will be addressed is the book itself. Getting rid of the book is certainly not going to get rid of the problem. If the teachers are intent on teaching this stuff then it is a sure thing they will just find another book to use that will teach the same thing. These same people will just keep trying the same thing over and over until they finally get this message to the young even as they have done with all their other socialist agendas.
Parents ought to be screaming about this yet the media doesn't report on it at all. But just let a student or teacher start some commencement with prayer and there are all kind of calls for suspensions and lawsuits and silencing the teacher or student and preventing the "forcing" of religion on other kids as though it might permanently damage them in some way.
What is the matter with our schools and our governments that this is going on. Worse still, what is the matter with the people of our nation that we continue to put up with all this stuff and let the courts silence the what is clearly the will of the majority?
A liberal democrat teacher of all people was one of the people to bring this to the attention of the public and now she is being attacked by her own people for standing up. The sad thing is that these ultra liberal attitudes are almost exclusively in the government, but these are the places that set policies. Because it is the government and because we view the government as being representative of the people we naturally assume that most people must feel the way they do and that we are in the majority. The fact that they so infect those certain groups makes anyone that is part of those groups but feels differently feel they are in the minority of all people but the truth is quite different and needs to be addressed. We need to confront those that are preaching sedition and treasonous things. We need to make it clear to them that those things are not ok. We need to get honorable judges in high places in the land.
The problem is that almost all of Washington is to one extent or another progressive and as such it is only a question of how liberal the judges they're going to choose are. They will choose liberal judges regardless it's just that the democrats will choose slightly less liberal judges. It is as though they have to try to sneak the conservative (reasonable) judges into their positions. Every time a conservative judge is suggested they are smeared, maligned and every manner of political maneuvering is used to make sure they don't get their position, but if an extremely liberal judge is put forward the conservatives say little or nothing about it and act as though they are just picking their battles. This is insane. They need to fight every battle. If you don't fight every battle in a war as though you want to win it then the few battles you actually fight, and the fewer still that you actually win eventually leave you surrounded and outnumbered.
It is time for parents and indeed all good and patriotic Americans wake up to the war being waged against our society by people determined to destroy it to the uttermost. We must fight these people in a way that shows them we mean to win and we're not going to be pushed around anymore. We're not going to allow them to set the agenda and determine the direction of our nation uncontested any longer. We're going to make them fight at every turn and not give one inch more of ground to these people. Where we do lose battles we will redouble our efforts in every other front line determined to win back territory. Rather than play defense when they attack we should be the first to attack.
Rather than wait and see what they are offering in books and just trying to reject those and pick from the best of the other bad choices we need to start picking books and writing books that put the American patriotic view back in our schools. We need to have books that tell us the wondrous tolerance of Christianity, which is certainly more tolerant than every other religion on planet earth today. We need to make them back off on their criticisms and attacks on Christianity.
It is time that we started having books in classrooms that trumpet the benefits of capitalism and free societies. We need to shout from the rooftops the advantages of our society over every other society in existence. There has never been another country like ours. From its start until now the United States has proven to be unique in all history.
There has never been another society like ours, either in wealth or freedom and we need to make that difference plain. We should not be cowed into silence anymore.
Let me also be clear that this does not mean that we should adopt their more violent and offensive tactics, but we should still face them down without fear. Propose our own values and start to implement them even as they have. We should meet them on the battlefield of ideas with clear and reasoned responses and force them to explain their reasoning instead of simply declaring their position as though it was already understood to be a superior position that we have no right to question.
We need to impress on all people the importance and possibility that they may lose their freedoms if they let us lose ours. This is done by making an effort to get our people into high positions in the educational position. This is how the socialists and communists have taken our education away from us and this is what they continue to do. It started with those that were only a little liberal and over time they kept progressing to more and more liberal people. They picked people who didn't mind staying mildly quiet about their liberal progressivism until they had already gotten into the positions of power. We need to do the same thing. Yes this may take time and it may be too late already but I believe it is still possible.
We need to remember that our position is the stronger position and that we are really the majority and as such we do not need to fear that they outnumber us, they DO NOT!
The subversion of everything we hold dear as a nation must be stopped. We need to prevent the socialists, communists and progressives from taking away everything that has meant anything to us all these years. They are busy rewriting our history. It has become so pervasive that many people no longer know what real history is and what was made up by the progressives. You need to go back to books that are more than 50 years old just to find any that have not been tainted by the leftist progressivism.
We must become agressive in our opposition and not allow our governmental officials to ignore our cries for justice and fairness. If we refuse to stand up for these things or if we cower we are bound to lose the most basic freedoms our founding fathers died to make sure we would get. This is a serious problem and we need to wake up and realize just how close to losing these things we actually are.
When the woman began to read all the curse words contained in the book used to teach third graders one of the board members asked her to refrain because there might be young people present! But wait isn't this book designed to be read by third graders. So at this point the woman cowered and apologized for the use of the language instead of asking the board member to explain that if he thought it was wrong it would certainly mean that such a book should not be used in the class room. But it never went there. Many of the people in the audience immediately recognized the hypocrisy of the board member regarding this.
It is one thing to insist the book stop being used, but should the people using the book and those who designated the book be questioned and even asked to resign for the seditious ways? Why is this kind of treason or sedition being allowed to be taught? Why are the teachers not questioned as well as the administrators who decided this book should be used? Why is there no call for resignation? What about the constitution of the state forbidding sedition to be taught in the classroom?
All of these are obvious questions, yet you can be sure that about the only thing that will be addressed is the book itself. Getting rid of the book is certainly not going to get rid of the problem. If the teachers are intent on teaching this stuff then it is a sure thing they will just find another book to use that will teach the same thing. These same people will just keep trying the same thing over and over until they finally get this message to the young even as they have done with all their other socialist agendas.
Parents ought to be screaming about this yet the media doesn't report on it at all. But just let a student or teacher start some commencement with prayer and there are all kind of calls for suspensions and lawsuits and silencing the teacher or student and preventing the "forcing" of religion on other kids as though it might permanently damage them in some way.
What is the matter with our schools and our governments that this is going on. Worse still, what is the matter with the people of our nation that we continue to put up with all this stuff and let the courts silence the what is clearly the will of the majority?
A liberal democrat teacher of all people was one of the people to bring this to the attention of the public and now she is being attacked by her own people for standing up. The sad thing is that these ultra liberal attitudes are almost exclusively in the government, but these are the places that set policies. Because it is the government and because we view the government as being representative of the people we naturally assume that most people must feel the way they do and that we are in the majority. The fact that they so infect those certain groups makes anyone that is part of those groups but feels differently feel they are in the minority of all people but the truth is quite different and needs to be addressed. We need to confront those that are preaching sedition and treasonous things. We need to make it clear to them that those things are not ok. We need to get honorable judges in high places in the land.
The problem is that almost all of Washington is to one extent or another progressive and as such it is only a question of how liberal the judges they're going to choose are. They will choose liberal judges regardless it's just that the democrats will choose slightly less liberal judges. It is as though they have to try to sneak the conservative (reasonable) judges into their positions. Every time a conservative judge is suggested they are smeared, maligned and every manner of political maneuvering is used to make sure they don't get their position, but if an extremely liberal judge is put forward the conservatives say little or nothing about it and act as though they are just picking their battles. This is insane. They need to fight every battle. If you don't fight every battle in a war as though you want to win it then the few battles you actually fight, and the fewer still that you actually win eventually leave you surrounded and outnumbered.
It is time for parents and indeed all good and patriotic Americans wake up to the war being waged against our society by people determined to destroy it to the uttermost. We must fight these people in a way that shows them we mean to win and we're not going to be pushed around anymore. We're not going to allow them to set the agenda and determine the direction of our nation uncontested any longer. We're going to make them fight at every turn and not give one inch more of ground to these people. Where we do lose battles we will redouble our efforts in every other front line determined to win back territory. Rather than play defense when they attack we should be the first to attack.
Rather than wait and see what they are offering in books and just trying to reject those and pick from the best of the other bad choices we need to start picking books and writing books that put the American patriotic view back in our schools. We need to have books that tell us the wondrous tolerance of Christianity, which is certainly more tolerant than every other religion on planet earth today. We need to make them back off on their criticisms and attacks on Christianity.
It is time that we started having books in classrooms that trumpet the benefits of capitalism and free societies. We need to shout from the rooftops the advantages of our society over every other society in existence. There has never been another country like ours. From its start until now the United States has proven to be unique in all history.
There has never been another society like ours, either in wealth or freedom and we need to make that difference plain. We should not be cowed into silence anymore.
Let me also be clear that this does not mean that we should adopt their more violent and offensive tactics, but we should still face them down without fear. Propose our own values and start to implement them even as they have. We should meet them on the battlefield of ideas with clear and reasoned responses and force them to explain their reasoning instead of simply declaring their position as though it was already understood to be a superior position that we have no right to question.
We need to impress on all people the importance and possibility that they may lose their freedoms if they let us lose ours. This is done by making an effort to get our people into high positions in the educational position. This is how the socialists and communists have taken our education away from us and this is what they continue to do. It started with those that were only a little liberal and over time they kept progressing to more and more liberal people. They picked people who didn't mind staying mildly quiet about their liberal progressivism until they had already gotten into the positions of power. We need to do the same thing. Yes this may take time and it may be too late already but I believe it is still possible.
We need to remember that our position is the stronger position and that we are really the majority and as such we do not need to fear that they outnumber us, they DO NOT!
The subversion of everything we hold dear as a nation must be stopped. We need to prevent the socialists, communists and progressives from taking away everything that has meant anything to us all these years. They are busy rewriting our history. It has become so pervasive that many people no longer know what real history is and what was made up by the progressives. You need to go back to books that are more than 50 years old just to find any that have not been tainted by the leftist progressivism.
We must become agressive in our opposition and not allow our governmental officials to ignore our cries for justice and fairness. If we refuse to stand up for these things or if we cower we are bound to lose the most basic freedoms our founding fathers died to make sure we would get. This is a serious problem and we need to wake up and realize just how close to losing these things we actually are.
Our President - Friend or Enemy
As I've been watching what's happening in the world I've begun to consider whether our president is acting more as a friend or an enemy to our nation and our allies.
Consider almost every economic thing our president has gotten behind seems almost designed to wreak havoc and break the back of our economy. We are being driven so far into debt with unbridaled spending that we are rapidly reaching the point where we will not possibly be able to pay off our debt.
Our president has either abandoned or at the very least insulted almost every one of our best allies or national friends. He gave back the bust of Winston Churchill to England. He had the gall to present the queen with an ipod. This is something you would give your kids not the head of state. What it cost him 150.00? What an insult.
He insulted the prime minister of Israel when he was here leaving in the middle of a meeting for family. He told Israel to stop building in their own capital city. Imagine if a foreign leader did the same regarding Washington because it once belonged to the Indians.
He turned on the leader of Egypt, one of our better allies in the Middle East and certainly a stabilizing factor there. He has offered no help to the king of Saudi Arabia. In fact it doesn't seem he's gone out of his way to defend a single ally of the United States.
At the same time he said nothing during the rebellion in Iran which certainly deserved at least as much criticism as the leader in Egypt. He has bowed to 3 kings or leaders of other countries, something never done by any president in our history.
He sent minimal help to Japan.
He has criticized anyone that has any negative thing to say about Islam in spite of the complete lack of any support even from the "moderate" Muslim to criticize the terrorist attacks.
Since the election he made it a point to say how he would have talks without conditions with Iran. He's given away the farm in his new treaty with Russia, certainly not to be considered our friend.
He got behind Rauf a man who should be considered a Muslim extremist, for building a mosque at ground zero, but has the gaul to criticize Christians at almost every turn declaring we are no longer a Christian nation.
We should also find it interesting how often we are told they are doing something to keep us safe. They behave as though we ought to live in constant fear and that only they can actually keep us safe.
I can't help but think eventually with all the talk of danger and potential danger that people don't slowly begin to believe it all. Consider the latest where Obama is not releasing the pictures of Osama's death because he's concerned about reprisals.... shouldn't he have thought about that before he had the man killed? doesn't he think this is enough of a reason for them to want to get us?
Consider almost every economic thing our president has gotten behind seems almost designed to wreak havoc and break the back of our economy. We are being driven so far into debt with unbridaled spending that we are rapidly reaching the point where we will not possibly be able to pay off our debt.
Our president has either abandoned or at the very least insulted almost every one of our best allies or national friends. He gave back the bust of Winston Churchill to England. He had the gall to present the queen with an ipod. This is something you would give your kids not the head of state. What it cost him 150.00? What an insult.
He insulted the prime minister of Israel when he was here leaving in the middle of a meeting for family. He told Israel to stop building in their own capital city. Imagine if a foreign leader did the same regarding Washington because it once belonged to the Indians.
He turned on the leader of Egypt, one of our better allies in the Middle East and certainly a stabilizing factor there. He has offered no help to the king of Saudi Arabia. In fact it doesn't seem he's gone out of his way to defend a single ally of the United States.
At the same time he said nothing during the rebellion in Iran which certainly deserved at least as much criticism as the leader in Egypt. He has bowed to 3 kings or leaders of other countries, something never done by any president in our history.
He sent minimal help to Japan.
He has criticized anyone that has any negative thing to say about Islam in spite of the complete lack of any support even from the "moderate" Muslim to criticize the terrorist attacks.
Since the election he made it a point to say how he would have talks without conditions with Iran. He's given away the farm in his new treaty with Russia, certainly not to be considered our friend.
He got behind Rauf a man who should be considered a Muslim extremist, for building a mosque at ground zero, but has the gaul to criticize Christians at almost every turn declaring we are no longer a Christian nation.
We should also find it interesting how often we are told they are doing something to keep us safe. They behave as though we ought to live in constant fear and that only they can actually keep us safe.
I can't help but think eventually with all the talk of danger and potential danger that people don't slowly begin to believe it all. Consider the latest where Obama is not releasing the pictures of Osama's death because he's concerned about reprisals.... shouldn't he have thought about that before he had the man killed? doesn't he think this is enough of a reason for them to want to get us?
Can't They Get Their Stories Straight?
We all learned as kids that when a person keeps changing what he's telling you it's because he's lying. After all there is not need to remember what you said or coordinate what you're going to say to people if you are all telling the truth. As many of our parents have told us if you tell the truth you don't have to remember what you said before, you only need to remember what happened. If you lye then you have to remember what you said last time as well as make sure everyone associated with the lie knows what the story is and says the same thing. Since none of them have an actual memory of what happened they will usually end up saying different things.
This is the position the Administration finds themselves in now. They cannot seem to get their stories straight and so every time they are interviewed they come up with a different story or slightly different facts. It is especially frustrating where Obama is concerned because it seems he is more concerned how it will make him look than what was actually done. Part of the problem is that Obama both despises the military and military action and he can't seem to do anything that will make the U.S. look good. He has such an overpowering need to degradate the U.S. and bring this nation down as an end goal of his socialist tendencies that he does not even want to give the smallest victory to the United States. He seems to feel that this will ultimately work against his plans to bring the country down.
I know this either sounds conspiratorial or the like, but of late I find that it is hard to think anything else. It seems his every action is designed to bring us down in the eyes of the world as well as in reality. Why doesn't the media confront him about these things? The reason is that the media is at least as socialist as Obama is. They too are not nearly so concerned with the facts as they are with the narrative.
Obama is the master of distraction. I think one of the things that concerns me here is that again he has managed to find yet another fairly meaningless distraction for the news and they are more than happy to run with only one major story at a time. Obama knew that he needed something to distract the nation from the devastation from the tornadoes, because he wasn't doing anything about them. Now he also needs that to distract everyone from the rising jobless numbers. What better thing than the death of OBL. This has given the media more than enough to work with for the last week. It's all they can talk about though if you think about it there really isn't much to analyze. There are no pictures and very few reports to go off. Of course Obama understands better than most that the fewer facts the media has the more they run with it.
I can't help but feel with his past history that there are not many other far more important things going on in the government right now that Obama is depending on this event to cover. Like so many other things it undoubtedly serves at least several purposes. Obama has to be aware of that his handling of this incident in the way he's been handling it is also going to inflame Muslims all over the world. As much as he declares we're not at war with Islam he believe he is doing almost everything he can to inflame just such a war in as many places as possible.
For some reason it is fine for the Muslims in all the free countries to declare how they want to kill all those infidels in the countries they're in; meaning every man woman and child and this is not hate speech to be criticized but let just one person say the slightest off color remark about Islam and all of a sudden it is treated as though we are trying to inflame a conflict and we hate all Muslims. Yet somehow we are the ones that are ever on the defensive regarding this issues.
Obama speaks out of one side of his mouth about how we finally showed those terrorists just how much we mean business and then cowers to post the photos of what we did to their leader. Now the Muslims are calling Bin Laden, Sheik Osama. We are all busy celebrating Osama's death, while the rest of the world is busy turning him into a martyr for the cause.
Our media and government behave as though there is no difference between us relishing in the pictures of the dead Osama and them relishing in the pictures of dead Jews from a terrorist bombing. What neither the media nor our administration recognize is the difference between reveling in the death of innocent people at the hands of the murderous Muslim terrorists and the death of the Murderer himself. Osama was certainly no innocent man. He masterminded the death of almost 3000 people in one attack. he deserved a public hanging and the most shameful death a man can die. Instead we kill him, hide the pictures and the real story and then given him a respectful ceremony so we can show how much we honor our enemies; yet another show of weakness where our enemies and especially the Muslims are concerned.
This is the position the Administration finds themselves in now. They cannot seem to get their stories straight and so every time they are interviewed they come up with a different story or slightly different facts. It is especially frustrating where Obama is concerned because it seems he is more concerned how it will make him look than what was actually done. Part of the problem is that Obama both despises the military and military action and he can't seem to do anything that will make the U.S. look good. He has such an overpowering need to degradate the U.S. and bring this nation down as an end goal of his socialist tendencies that he does not even want to give the smallest victory to the United States. He seems to feel that this will ultimately work against his plans to bring the country down.
I know this either sounds conspiratorial or the like, but of late I find that it is hard to think anything else. It seems his every action is designed to bring us down in the eyes of the world as well as in reality. Why doesn't the media confront him about these things? The reason is that the media is at least as socialist as Obama is. They too are not nearly so concerned with the facts as they are with the narrative.
Obama is the master of distraction. I think one of the things that concerns me here is that again he has managed to find yet another fairly meaningless distraction for the news and they are more than happy to run with only one major story at a time. Obama knew that he needed something to distract the nation from the devastation from the tornadoes, because he wasn't doing anything about them. Now he also needs that to distract everyone from the rising jobless numbers. What better thing than the death of OBL. This has given the media more than enough to work with for the last week. It's all they can talk about though if you think about it there really isn't much to analyze. There are no pictures and very few reports to go off. Of course Obama understands better than most that the fewer facts the media has the more they run with it.
I can't help but feel with his past history that there are not many other far more important things going on in the government right now that Obama is depending on this event to cover. Like so many other things it undoubtedly serves at least several purposes. Obama has to be aware of that his handling of this incident in the way he's been handling it is also going to inflame Muslims all over the world. As much as he declares we're not at war with Islam he believe he is doing almost everything he can to inflame just such a war in as many places as possible.
For some reason it is fine for the Muslims in all the free countries to declare how they want to kill all those infidels in the countries they're in; meaning every man woman and child and this is not hate speech to be criticized but let just one person say the slightest off color remark about Islam and all of a sudden it is treated as though we are trying to inflame a conflict and we hate all Muslims. Yet somehow we are the ones that are ever on the defensive regarding this issues.
Obama speaks out of one side of his mouth about how we finally showed those terrorists just how much we mean business and then cowers to post the photos of what we did to their leader. Now the Muslims are calling Bin Laden, Sheik Osama. We are all busy celebrating Osama's death, while the rest of the world is busy turning him into a martyr for the cause.
Our media and government behave as though there is no difference between us relishing in the pictures of the dead Osama and them relishing in the pictures of dead Jews from a terrorist bombing. What neither the media nor our administration recognize is the difference between reveling in the death of innocent people at the hands of the murderous Muslim terrorists and the death of the Murderer himself. Osama was certainly no innocent man. He masterminded the death of almost 3000 people in one attack. he deserved a public hanging and the most shameful death a man can die. Instead we kill him, hide the pictures and the real story and then given him a respectful ceremony so we can show how much we honor our enemies; yet another show of weakness where our enemies and especially the Muslims are concerned.
A President with no Compassion
How is it that a president who tries to act as though he is so concerned for the downtrodden and the underprivileged seems to have no time to even mention much less seriously address the tornado disasters in our nation which were the worst in our history.
Obama has had nothing to say about the severe flooding now in the Midwest. He had nothing to say about the blizzards. The only reason he had anything to say about the oil was because it was an opportune time to destroy the oil industry.
It is as though he does not really care about what’s happening to the country at all. It might even be more meaningful to say that he cares, but what he wants to happen is all the disasters that are happening. It seems he is seeking to reek every bit of damage to our nation he can before he finally gets kicked out of office. It seems Obama feels that capitalism is the completely wrong direction for this country and anything that helps being down capitalism will be for the good of the country no matter how many people are hurt. This of course has been the attitude of all socialists and communists. The end justifies the means. Stalin, Mao, Lenin... none of them care about the suffering of the people. In fact in many cases they intensified it to solidify the place of socialism and communism as well as their rule. More and more I can't help but believe Obama is motivated by a similar philosophy of government.
I have little doubt during the next election that we are likely to see more voter fraud in our nation than we have ever experienced in our history. It may even come to be said that the election was stolen if things get bad enough. Is this really the kind of nation we want to live in? If it isn’t some disaster being created by Obama or the administration directly, then it is the senate and the house, and if it isn’t them then it seems it is natural disasters like we’ve never seen before. It is as though all of heaven is conspiring against us.
I have little doubt on the natural disasters we can all pull together and help for a better end. These are things that happen to every generation and every generation seems able to overcome. What nations cannot survive is when their leaders turn against them and seek their destruction for the sake of power or some ideology that has already proven it doesn’t work.
now afraid to question him regarding it. I am beginning to have my doubts as to the source of this latest version of his birth certificate. It seems perfectly timed as yet another distraction. There are a lot of questions being raised and to his credit and his genius Obama has successfully made everyone believe that the “birthers” are just another group of nutty conspiracy people. All he had to do was produce another certificate of life birth and say it was the genuine one and people are now even more afraid to criticize it, but again I has not come out that a single reliable person has seen anything but the electronic copy. I could produce an electronic copy of my own birth certificate in almost no time at all and have it say I was born almost anywhere I wanted and I don’t have nearly the money or power Obama has. Surely he is able to fabricate a better copy than the ones that have been produced. The last one he produced seems to go on endlessly as though there is no edge to the paper on 3 sides, and as though it were part of a book on the fourth side. Doesn’t anyone else find this the slightest bit odd? Yet no one will say anything about this oddity. All of the media, Fox included seems to behave as though this has settled it since they were already sure in the first place. It also means that he will likely not have to produce anything else when the next election comes because everyone will behave as though it was already established that he was born here.
One question I would still like answered and one that has been avoided since this entire situation began is why he worked so hard to cover it up for almost 2 years? This aspect to the birth certificate issue is just one of many to be overlooked by the media concerning this issue.
This president is far more concerned about himself and his political aspirations than about the kind of job he is actually doing for the people of this nation. None of his actions show that he views himself as a servant of the people in the least. Even a casual look shows that he views himself as both a ruler and an elite ruler at that. He doesn’t seem to feel that anyone should be allowed to criticize him about anything. Every criticism is views as something racial and seems to be always put in that light. He works through intimidation and fear. He seems to view these as desirable qualities.
He has gotten a great deal done by the use of dividing people and causing antagonism between different groups. He is not the great compromises he keeps telling us he is. He is not the Great Uniter. He is the great divider. His background as a community organizer has taught him only method of dealing with opposition and it has taught him this method of dealing with opposition is very effective at getting what you want. It has not taught him to work together with others except insofar as it has taught him to work with other people who are all trying to create division among everyone they can. This is most certainly not the work of a peacemaker. He seems only to seek as much chaos as he can create. He is most comfortable with chaos as long as he is the one in control of it and as long as it is working in his favor. He loves a good fight and is even more than willing to proke one if one does not exist. He has demonstrated this propensity on many occasions.
Do we really want a man in the White House who takes every opportunity to divide Americans one against another? Is this what we are really looking for in a president? I cannot believe this is really the case. If this is the best we can find or desire in a president then our nation deserves what it gets.
I do not believe the American people desire this wholly, or at least I don't believe this is really what we want in a president and leader. I believe that Americans are looking for a leader who is willing to actually take a stand against the political correctness that has infected our society. I believe we are looking for a leader who will stand for what is morally good and right. I believe we are looking for a leader who believes our government has grown too big and needs to be reined in.
I wonder if the people of this nation will have the guts to kick all those out of office who seem to think they are our rulers and not our servants. I wonder if we will be willing to risk voting on people who are not seasoned politicians but seem more to be honest men who have the concern of the nation at heart.
Why is it that these kinds of people are so hard to find. You would think normal Americans who are more concerned with the well being of our nation than they are with getting re-elected would be easier to find. Maybe it's just that we've become a nation of people that only get voted in if they have millions of dollars. If they don't have millions of dollars for advertising then they don't seem to win. It is also clear that the media picks their winners. If they don't like someone or just don't think they have a chance of winning then they stop covering them. The media also seems consumed with how much a candidate can raise as an indicator of how popular he is and how likely he is to win. They also think the one with the most money will win, which only says that they think Americans are just that stupid and that we don't know any better who to choose. They think we will only choose those who have a lot of money. Is this really all we look for in a candidate? I can't believe it is and I have to believe that Americans are smarter than that.
Obama has had nothing to say about the severe flooding now in the Midwest. He had nothing to say about the blizzards. The only reason he had anything to say about the oil was because it was an opportune time to destroy the oil industry.
It is as though he does not really care about what’s happening to the country at all. It might even be more meaningful to say that he cares, but what he wants to happen is all the disasters that are happening. It seems he is seeking to reek every bit of damage to our nation he can before he finally gets kicked out of office. It seems Obama feels that capitalism is the completely wrong direction for this country and anything that helps being down capitalism will be for the good of the country no matter how many people are hurt. This of course has been the attitude of all socialists and communists. The end justifies the means. Stalin, Mao, Lenin... none of them care about the suffering of the people. In fact in many cases they intensified it to solidify the place of socialism and communism as well as their rule. More and more I can't help but believe Obama is motivated by a similar philosophy of government.
I have little doubt during the next election that we are likely to see more voter fraud in our nation than we have ever experienced in our history. It may even come to be said that the election was stolen if things get bad enough. Is this really the kind of nation we want to live in? If it isn’t some disaster being created by Obama or the administration directly, then it is the senate and the house, and if it isn’t them then it seems it is natural disasters like we’ve never seen before. It is as though all of heaven is conspiring against us.
I have little doubt on the natural disasters we can all pull together and help for a better end. These are things that happen to every generation and every generation seems able to overcome. What nations cannot survive is when their leaders turn against them and seek their destruction for the sake of power or some ideology that has already proven it doesn’t work.
now afraid to question him regarding it. I am beginning to have my doubts as to the source of this latest version of his birth certificate. It seems perfectly timed as yet another distraction. There are a lot of questions being raised and to his credit and his genius Obama has successfully made everyone believe that the “birthers” are just another group of nutty conspiracy people. All he had to do was produce another certificate of life birth and say it was the genuine one and people are now even more afraid to criticize it, but again I has not come out that a single reliable person has seen anything but the electronic copy. I could produce an electronic copy of my own birth certificate in almost no time at all and have it say I was born almost anywhere I wanted and I don’t have nearly the money or power Obama has. Surely he is able to fabricate a better copy than the ones that have been produced. The last one he produced seems to go on endlessly as though there is no edge to the paper on 3 sides, and as though it were part of a book on the fourth side. Doesn’t anyone else find this the slightest bit odd? Yet no one will say anything about this oddity. All of the media, Fox included seems to behave as though this has settled it since they were already sure in the first place. It also means that he will likely not have to produce anything else when the next election comes because everyone will behave as though it was already established that he was born here.
One question I would still like answered and one that has been avoided since this entire situation began is why he worked so hard to cover it up for almost 2 years? This aspect to the birth certificate issue is just one of many to be overlooked by the media concerning this issue.
This president is far more concerned about himself and his political aspirations than about the kind of job he is actually doing for the people of this nation. None of his actions show that he views himself as a servant of the people in the least. Even a casual look shows that he views himself as both a ruler and an elite ruler at that. He doesn’t seem to feel that anyone should be allowed to criticize him about anything. Every criticism is views as something racial and seems to be always put in that light. He works through intimidation and fear. He seems to view these as desirable qualities.
He has gotten a great deal done by the use of dividing people and causing antagonism between different groups. He is not the great compromises he keeps telling us he is. He is not the Great Uniter. He is the great divider. His background as a community organizer has taught him only method of dealing with opposition and it has taught him this method of dealing with opposition is very effective at getting what you want. It has not taught him to work together with others except insofar as it has taught him to work with other people who are all trying to create division among everyone they can. This is most certainly not the work of a peacemaker. He seems only to seek as much chaos as he can create. He is most comfortable with chaos as long as he is the one in control of it and as long as it is working in his favor. He loves a good fight and is even more than willing to proke one if one does not exist. He has demonstrated this propensity on many occasions.
Do we really want a man in the White House who takes every opportunity to divide Americans one against another? Is this what we are really looking for in a president? I cannot believe this is really the case. If this is the best we can find or desire in a president then our nation deserves what it gets.
I do not believe the American people desire this wholly, or at least I don't believe this is really what we want in a president and leader. I believe that Americans are looking for a leader who is willing to actually take a stand against the political correctness that has infected our society. I believe we are looking for a leader who will stand for what is morally good and right. I believe we are looking for a leader who believes our government has grown too big and needs to be reined in.
I wonder if the people of this nation will have the guts to kick all those out of office who seem to think they are our rulers and not our servants. I wonder if we will be willing to risk voting on people who are not seasoned politicians but seem more to be honest men who have the concern of the nation at heart.
Why is it that these kinds of people are so hard to find. You would think normal Americans who are more concerned with the well being of our nation than they are with getting re-elected would be easier to find. Maybe it's just that we've become a nation of people that only get voted in if they have millions of dollars. If they don't have millions of dollars for advertising then they don't seem to win. It is also clear that the media picks their winners. If they don't like someone or just don't think they have a chance of winning then they stop covering them. The media also seems consumed with how much a candidate can raise as an indicator of how popular he is and how likely he is to win. They also think the one with the most money will win, which only says that they think Americans are just that stupid and that we don't know any better who to choose. They think we will only choose those who have a lot of money. Is this really all we look for in a candidate? I can't believe it is and I have to believe that Americans are smarter than that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)