Sunday, September 1, 2013

Obama the Great Destabilizer



I cannot remember a president who seems to have been so determined to destabilize every situation around him. Obama has worked almost ceaselessly at destabilizing almost every situation around him that can be destabilized. He seems to revel in chaos. It should also be said that he is all too well aware of the power to control people through such chaos.
Consider how frequently and in how many situations he has caused instability, chaos, set people at odds with each other. He has hardly missed an opportunity to set blacks against whites. He continually inserts himself into every situation where whites and blacks have been in opposition. Often he has said we don’t have all the facts, but then pronounces a judgment. He has helped the people in Libya against Khadafy. He helped the Arab spring, in which the Muslim Brotherhood took power and now continues to insert himself there taking the side of the Brotherhood even though it is clear the Egyptians don’t want them in power. Yet at the same time he trumpeted how great it was that they were exercising democracy, but isn’t too happy with it now. He is now involved inserting himself into the Syrian situation even though he has no definitive evidence it was Assad who did the chemical attacks and some indication that it was the rebels. He once again is taking the side of those rebels who belong to Al-Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood. Has constantly taunted Israel and made demands of them he knows they cannot and will not adhere to.
Due to Obama’s constant interference in the Middle East and among other Muslim nations he seems to be actively setting as much of the Muslim world against the United States as he can. Many say this just show how inept he is at foreign politics, but I say he understands how well the principles of Saul Alinsky work no matter what the scale is you’re dealing with. Oddly the one situation he made sure not to say anything about was when the rebellion in Iran happened. He didn’t issue a single word about how those people were fighting for their freedom or that we supported their cause even if we couldn’t send troops. One cannot help but wonder if it is more than just destabilizing, but supporting the side of the radical Muslims. He refuses to criticize them in anyway. He won’t even use the word Terrorist when referring to them and won’t allow any in his administration to do, yet he is more than happy to label Christians, conservatives, vets, and every other group that stands for patriotism and good will as terrorists. He is more than happy to use that word when referring to anyone that opposes his policies or choices.
The media behaves as though this is justified. They even do all they can to lend their support of his every policy and word. It is as hard to find criticism of Obama in the media as it is to find criticism of the Muslims in the media, or as it is to find a single Muslim that will condemn any of the Muslim actions. In all of this there is little backlash from Americans regarding his actions or words, though this may just be a testament to how well the media’s propaganda works, which will of course only encourage them to continue. I have little doubt that in their mind the propaganda is working quite well. Due to their near total control of what you see in the news they either don’t report it at all or they change the meaning of what you hear. Even with all this Americans are finding they simply won’t buy their papers anymore and they are also not watching their TV channels anymore. Still they don’t care. They only care about the narrative and the job they have of constantly covering for the president no matter how absurd his actions or words are.
Ask yourself a question, “Is Obama more like Martin Luther King Jr. or more like Jesse Jackson, or one of the Black Panthers, who only seek to divide and incite? Can anyone name a single speech of Obama’s that actually sought to bring healing in race relations? I have little doubt in his mind that the manner of bringing about good race relations is much like the Muslim’s answer to bring about world peace; it only comes through domination.
Obama is a man who creates mischief, and discord at every turn. It is amazing how unabashedly the bible addresses such things: Psa 7:14  Behold, he travaileth with iniquity, and hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood. And again, Psa 10:7  His mouth is full of cursing and deceit and fraud: under his tongue is mischief and vanity.
Pro 4:14-17  Enter not into the path of the wicked, and go not in the way of evil men.  (15)  Avoid it, pass not by it, turn from it, and pass away.  (16)  For they sleep not, except they have done mischief; and their sleep is taken away, unless they cause some to fall.  (17)  For they eat the bread of wickedness, and drink the wine of violence. All of the above quotes from the bible sound so much like the behavior of our current sitting president as well as many of our representatives. In order to maintain their power they must continually cut down others and set people at odds with each other. Please understand I do not believe Obama is the only one in government that is doing this, but he, by far, has the ability to cause more trouble and mayhem by doing so than any other individual in the nation.
Sadly it seems Obama is determined to create as many enemies for the United States as possible before he finally leave office. Even if he doesn’t start a lot more wars he will surely be the cause of attacks and bad feelings toward the United States for many years to come unless our next president is as much a genius at least relationships as Obama is at destroying them. I don’t suppose this is terribly likely and as a result we are likely to see a great deal of trouble for the United States for at least the next 10 years or more.
The disruptions caused have been between the House and the Senate, between Republicans and Democrats, and between almost any other group possible and any group that even slightly opposes them. Obama seeks to make so that before he leaves office almost no one will find it possible to work with each other.
Obama is famous for saying one thing so you’ll allow him to take some action and then doing something completely difference and oddly those that give him the go ahead take the blame for what he did, or at least they feel responsible in some way. At one point does Obama accept responsibility for the things he’s done and the situations he’s inserted himself into. He has race-bated at least as much as any of the black panthers.
Obama has now said on several occasions that he feels and attack on Syria is both justified and even necessary both morally and for national security. It seems he feels just by saying anything that it makes it so. He has yet to make a single case for how an attack on Syria would be in our national interest unless he’s talking about oil, but even with this all he’s doing is destabilizing the Middle East which is only going to drive the cost of fuel oil up that much more. If we are honest about it, Obama has said on repeated occasions as have his minions that he wants to see the price of fuel skyrocket. He has continually acted as though burning fossil fuels is the worst thing that could happen either in our nation or in the rest of the world, though the focus has most often been on the United States.
For some reason even the portion of the media that is willing to be critical of Obama would prefer to believe that he is incompetent rather than believe the things that are happening are intentional. The pattern of setting people against each other is so prevalent in everything he does that it cannot be ignored. Obama is a master of division. He probably learned and perfected this technique during his days as a community organizer. They are experts at bring people and organization down through discord and defamation. These are the tactics of Saul Alinski and they have shown to be very effective tactics which is why I have no doubt they are the ones Obama chooses to use. He does not know how to accomplish things through genuine communication and compromise. I’m not even sure that the concept of compromise exists in his lexicon. Even as he divides people he insists by words such things as, “most people agree” or “everyone agree”. Through these sweeping statements he garners some level of support because the individual is made to feel that he is somehow out of step if he doesn’t agree as well.
Obama also displays the typical behavior of a bully in several respects. Again I believe this started with his days as a community organizer where such tactics work. In another respect though he also behaves much like a typical high school bully. He is all bluster and very threatening with the power he wields or at least seems to wield till he is confronted by someone who won’t be bullied. At that point Obama doesn’t know what to do, because like all bullies it is more bluff that reality. It is more bark than bite. Obama was willing to go to Syria as long as he felt like he would have a gang to back him up, namely European nations, but now that they have all backed away from what he wants to do he is really afraid to act alone. When he has his “gang” with him he can share the blame and make it seem that the others felt the same so it’s not really his fault. Obama again like most bullies is not big on responsibility, he prefers blame where it will get him out of a fix and as such he always looks for shared responsibility. He is afraid to make decision on his own. I can’t help but wonder if he’s ever made any serious decisions on his own no matter what they may be. He is very good at claiming the glory if the outcome is good even when he doesn’t really deserve, but he has yet to accept responsibility for a single thing.
He was and seems still to be prepared to take us into another word just so he personally doesn’t lose face. But again he wants a gang behind him and this the reason he’s now saying he wants to get Congress’s approval. The rest of the world has already shown that they disapprove of what he wants to do and he is also probably aware that he has no constitutional right to make a unilateral decision to take us into another war without a direct attack, but he is also never willing to be made to look the fool. He has no way to back out of what he has threatened so now he feels compelled to follow through. This behavior is the behavior of a narcissistic sower of discord. He would gladly throw the whole world into turmoil before he would be made to look the fool or before he give an inch on anything he wanted to do.
I am greatly surprised that this kind of behavior from the highest ranking representative of our nation is in any way considered acceptable. I keep thinking at some point someone will call the president on this behavior but no one in the media will and the American people really have no voice but their representatives who equally don’t care to actually represent us as they ought to. Since it seems the NSA is now watching everything we do online which probably also means the IRS has access to this information; otherwise how could they harass those that have altering views from our president, then we can safely expect if we want the president to get the message all we need to do is write something and post it online and the president will get the message.
If enough of us do this they would not be able to harass the whole nation or even 50% of it. It is time for the American people to stand up and make a statement about what is going on. It is for that reason that I’ve decided to start posting more to my blog again. We have a president who seems more interested in breaking things down than in building them up. This most certainly needs to be addressed and if possible brought to an end.

No comments: