Class Warfare

I do not understand why so many people are surprised that Obama is launching his campaign of class warfare. Is this not one of the staples of Socialism and Communism. It is all about divide and conquer. There is really little difference between this and the methods used by community organizer, or maybe it's the other way around.

Has there ever been a socialist or communist that didn't use the class warfare weapon. The reason they use it is that it tends to be very effective. You pit the have nots against the haves and promise them you'll take all or plenty from the haves so that the have nots can have without even having to work for it, which is of course why the have not, have not! People generally don't have because they are either unwilling to work or what it will take to have, while the haves look at every opportunity and do everything they can to make sure they get their piece of the pie through hard work.

Hard work and money seem to have become dirty words of late. It is probably one of the reasons that the bible and most religions are down on envy. Envy invariably leads to war and strife.

This kind of behavior is unbecoming of a president. We should never have a president that sets himself to creating discord among the people. Any president willing to do this is setting himself against the best good of the people. We need to realize just how serious this is.

We have every right to ask, and we ought to ask whether our president seeks to build unity and good will among the people or whether he sets himself to creating discord, envy and strife by the words he uses.

The media is afraid to call Obama a socialist or a communist even though both of these describe him much better than being a capitalist does. Clearly the media has been running interference for the president for a long time and they are not even trying to hide it any more. They don't mind being overt in their support. At one time they thought all they had to do was keep declaring that they were unbiased and people would believe it, but now it has become so obvious that it is not really possible for anyone to believe they are neutral any more.

Consider how the L.A. Times has continued to sit on a video they have of Obama with Khalidi before the election. Yes it is true that we can only speculate on what is in the video because unfortunately the video belongs to the L.A. Times and not Fox News. For some reason the L.A. Times is determined to hide exactly what is n that video. This means that we can only speculate based on their bias for the president that it must be something very damaging that they still cannot afford to let out. maybe they're thinking they'll hold onto it till he's out of office and then produce it for some documentary. The problem with this is that they've kept this under wraps for so long now that unless it really isn't much they can never afford to release it without condemning themselves for not reporting it.

This being the case the only way that video will ever see the light of day is if some hacker somewhere finds a way into the L.A. Times and grabs it and posts it to the internet the way they did with the global warming emails that turned out to be so damning. If not that, then the only other hope is that some whistleblower will grab it and release it to the public so that we can still come to know what's in it.

It seems to me that it is important that this be released but I'm certainly not holding my breath.

Obama has been very successful at getting his entire agenda pushed through and all the time has managed to keep his hands off most of it only taking credit for things once they're put through. He is very good at using "useful idiots" like Pelosi and Reid, who, though willing accomplices, are being used nonetheless. Obama will happily discard them if they become a detriment to his cause.

Why is it that people feel that rich people somehow don't deserve their money? Whether they got it through intelligent investment, hard work, or even through inheritance, does it matter? Ask yourself, if your parents or some other person left you a lot of money, do you really feel that 50% or more of it should be taken from you? If you worked hard for 20 years and through that hard work and careful savings amassed a couple of million dollars do you really feel it would only be right to have 50% or more of it taken from you? Wouldn't that be the same as taking 10 years of your life from you?

This class warfare we are hearing thrown around almost as much as racism is absurd. When we hear any representative put it forward we ought to Boo them until they finally stop doing it. You have a right to the money you have, and no man has a right to take it from you simply because you have it!

Enough is enough. This money was not gotten through nefarious means. It was not gained illegally, and any person out there has the opportunity to do the same thing. If people like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates feel they aren't giving enough to the government, they don't need any one to force everyone in opulent situation to give up their opulence all they need to do is give the government everything they feel the government should take. This being the case you only need to ask why aren't they doing that then?